Free webp to jpg
EN
Image MIME Reference
JPM

JPEG 2000 Compound Image File Format

image/jpm
VS

Microsoft Image Extension

image/vnd.mix
MIX

A complete technical comparison of JPEG 2000 Compound Image File Format and Microsoft Image Extension — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature JPM MIX
Transparency (Alpha) Yes Yes
Animation Support ✕ No ✕ No
Progressive Loading Yes ✕ No
HDR Support ✕ No ✕ No
EXIF Metadata Yes ✕ No
ICC Color Profile Yes Yes
JPEG 2000 Compound Image File Format
image/jpm
Extension
.jpm.jpgm
Container ISOBMFF / JPM (ISO/IEC 15444-6)
Compression Lossy / Lossless / Mixed Raster Content (MRC)
Algorithm
JPEG 2000JBIG2JPEGMMR
Color Depth 1-bit (Text/Masks), 8-bit, 16-bit, 24-bit
Developed by Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG)
Released 2003
Magic Bytes
00 00 00 0C 6A 50 20 20 0D 0A 87 0A ... 66 74 79 70 6A 70 6D 20
Full JPM reference →
Microsoft Image Extension
image/vnd.mix
Extension
.mix
Container Microsoft OLE Structured Storage (COM)
Compression Proprietary (Internal JPEG/RLE)
Algorithm
JPEGDeflateProprietary
Color Depth 8-bit, 24-bit, 32-bit (RGBA)
Developed by Microsoft Corporation
Released 1996
Magic Bytes
D0 CF 11 E0 A1 B1 1A E1
Full MIX reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser JPM MIX
Chrome Chrome
✕ ✕
Firefox Firefox
✕ ✕
Safari Safari
✕ ✕
Edge Edge
✕ ✕
IE IE (Legacy)
✕ ✕
JPM

JPM Strengths

  • Highly optimized for scanned documents, drastically reducing file sizes without sacrificing the readability of text or the quality of embedded photos
  • Supports multi-page documents within a single file
  • Object-based architecture allows for complex layout representation and independent extraction of elements
Limitations
  • Failed to achieve widespread adoption, largely being overshadowed by PDF/A and DjVu
  • Zero native web browser compatibility
  • Requires complex, specialized software to properly encode and decode the multi-layered MRC structure
MIX

MIX Strengths

  • Allowed early consumer software to non-destructively edit complex compositions involving photos, text, and vector clipart
  • Shared an architecture with other Microsoft Office products, enabling deep integration (OLE embedding) into Word and PowerPoint at the time
Limitations
  • Completely proprietary and undocumented, leading to a massive loss of historical data for users who archived their family photos in this project format
  • Requires traversing a complex OLE filesystem just to extract the flattened raster image
  • No support in modern image editors like Photoshop, GIMP, or web browsers

When to choose which format

JPM
Use JPM when…
  • Scanned Document Archiving
  • Mixed Raster Content (MRC) Imaging
  • Digital Libraries
MIX
Use MIX when…
  • Historical Microsoft Picture It! Projects
  • Microsoft PhotoDraw 2000 Graphics
  • Early 2000s Consumer Digital Scrapbooking

More comparisons

JPM vs ACES → MIX vs ACES → JPM vs APNG → MIX vs APNG → JPM vs AVCI → MIX vs AVCI → JPM vs AVCS → MIX vs AVCS → JPM vs AVIF → MIX vs AVIF → All comparisons →
Share this comparison