Free webp to jpg
EN
Image MIME Reference
AVCS

AVC Image Sequence (HEIF Container)

image/avcs
VS

Microsoft Image Extension

image/vnd.mix
MIX

A complete technical comparison of AVC Image Sequence (HEIF Container) and Microsoft Image Extension — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature AVCS MIX
Transparency (Alpha) Yes Yes
Animation Support Yes ✕ No
Progressive Loading ✕ No ✕ No
HDR Support Yes ✕ No
EXIF Metadata Yes ✕ No
ICC Color Profile Yes Yes
AVC Image Sequence (HEIF Container)
image/avcs
Extension
.avcs.heifs
Container HEIF / ISOBMFF (ISO/IEC 14496-12)
Compression Lossy / Lossless
Algorithm
AVC (Advanced Video Coding / H.264)
Color Depth 8-bit, 10-bit, 12-bit
Developed by Moving Picture Experts Group (MPEG) / ISO/IEC JTC 1
Released 2015
Magic Bytes
XX XX XX XX 66 74 79 70 61 76 63 73
Full AVCS reference →
Microsoft Image Extension
image/vnd.mix
Extension
.mix
Container Microsoft OLE Structured Storage (COM)
Compression Proprietary (Internal JPEG/RLE)
Algorithm
JPEGDeflateProprietary
Color Depth 8-bit, 24-bit, 32-bit (RGBA)
Developed by Microsoft Corporation
Released 1996
Magic Bytes
D0 CF 11 E0 A1 B1 1A E1
Full MIX reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser AVCS MIX
Chrome Chrome
✕ ✕
Firefox Firefox
✕ ✕
Safari Safari
✕ ✕
Edge Edge
✕ ✕
IE IE (Legacy)
✕ ✕
AVCS

AVCS Strengths

  • Efficiently stores bursts of images or animations utilizing inter-frame compression
  • Leverages the highly compatible and widely hardware-accelerated AVC (H.264) codec
  • Robust HEIF container supports extensive metadata, alpha channels, and depth maps
Limitations
  • Zero native support in web browsers
  • Largely superseded in efficiency by newer sequence formats like HEICS (HEVC) or Animated AVIF (AV1)
  • Complicated container structure requires specialized parsing libraries
MIX

MIX Strengths

  • Allowed early consumer software to non-destructively edit complex compositions involving photos, text, and vector clipart
  • Shared an architecture with other Microsoft Office products, enabling deep integration (OLE embedding) into Word and PowerPoint at the time
Limitations
  • Completely proprietary and undocumented, leading to a massive loss of historical data for users who archived their family photos in this project format
  • Requires traversing a complex OLE filesystem just to extract the flattened raster image
  • No support in modern image editors like Photoshop, GIMP, or web browsers

When to choose which format

AVCS
Use AVCS when…
  • Burst Photography
  • Short Animations
  • Camera Capture
  • Archival Storage
MIX
Use MIX when…
  • Historical Microsoft Picture It! Projects
  • Microsoft PhotoDraw 2000 Graphics
  • Early 2000s Consumer Digital Scrapbooking

More comparisons

AVCS vs ACES → MIX vs ACES → AVCS vs APNG → MIX vs APNG → AVCS vs AVCI → MIX vs AVCI → AVCS vs AVIF → MIX vs AVIF → All comparisons →
Share this comparison