Image MIME Reference
MIX
Microsoft Image Extension
image/vnd.mix
VS
Microsoft Document Imaging
image/vnd.ms-modi
MODI
A complete technical comparison of Microsoft Image Extension and Microsoft Document Imaging — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | MIX | MODI |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | Yes | ✕ No |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| HDR Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| EXIF Metadata | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| ICC Color Profile | Yes | ✕ No |
Microsoft Image Extension
image/vnd.mix
Extension
.mix
Container
Microsoft OLE Structured Storage (COM)
Compression
Proprietary (Internal JPEG/RLE)
Algorithm
JPEGDeflateProprietary
Color Depth
8-bit, 24-bit, 32-bit (RGBA)
Developed by
Microsoft Corporation
Released
1996
Magic Bytes
D0 CF 11 E0 A1 B1 1A E1
Microsoft Document Imaging
image/vnd.ms-modi
Extension
.mdi
Container
TIFF Variant
Compression
LZW / Proprietary MS Compression
Algorithm
LZW (Modified)
Color Depth
1-bit (Monochrome), 8-bit (Grayscale), 24-bit (RGB)
Developed by
Microsoft Corporation
Released
2001
Magic Bytes
49 49 2A 00
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | MIX | MODI |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ | ✕ |
Firefox
|
✕ | ✕ |
Safari
|
✕ | ✕ |
Edge
|
✕ | ✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ | ✕ |
MIX
MIX Strengths
- Allowed early consumer software to non-destructively edit complex compositions involving photos, text, and vector clipart
- Shared an architecture with other Microsoft Office products, enabling deep integration (OLE embedding) into Word and PowerPoint at the time
Limitations
- Completely proprietary and undocumented, leading to a massive loss of historical data for users who archived their family photos in this project format
- Requires traversing a complex OLE filesystem just to extract the flattened raster image
- No support in modern image editors like Photoshop, GIMP, or web browsers
MODI
MODI Strengths
- Historically provided an excellent all-in-one scanned document format with built-in OCR and annotations before PDF editing became universally accessible
- Tightly integrated with Microsoft Office and SharePoint workflows in the early 2000s
Limitations
- Completely proprietary and obsolete; Microsoft abandoned it in favor of standard TIFF and PDF
- Causes widespread identification conflicts since its file signature is identical to a standard TIFF
- Extremely difficult to open on modern operating systems without relying on third-party conversion utilities
When to choose which format
MIX
Use MIX when…
- Historical Microsoft Picture It! Projects
- Microsoft PhotoDraw 2000 Graphics
- Early 2000s Consumer Digital Scrapbooking
MODI
Use MODI when…
- Legacy Scanned Document Archival
- Microsoft Office XP/2003/2007 Workflows
- Embedded OCR Text Storage