Free webp to jpg
EN
Image MIME Reference
Kodak-K25

Kodak K25 Raw Image

image/x-kodak-k25
VS

Khronos Texture

image/ktx
KTX

A complete technical comparison of Kodak K25 Raw Image and Khronos Texture — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature Kodak-K25 KTX
Transparency (Alpha) ✕ No Yes
Animation Support ✕ No ✕ No
Progressive Loading ✕ No ✕ No
HDR Support Yes Yes
EXIF Metadata Yes ✕ No
ICC Color Profile ✕ No ✕ No
Kodak K25 Raw Image
image/x-kodak-k25
Extension
.k25
Container Proprietary Kodak Raw (TIFF-based variant)
Compression Uncompressed / Proprietary Lossless
Algorithm
Proprietary Kodak Compression
Color Depth 10-bit, 12-bit (Per Channel)
Developed by Eastman Kodak Company
Released 1996
Magic Bytes
Varies (Often resembles TIFF header 49 49 2A 00 or requires proprietary parsing)
Full Kodak-K25 reference →
Khronos Texture
image/ktx
Extension
.ktx
Container KTX (Khronos Texture 1.1)
Compression Uncompressed / GPU Compressed (ASTC, ETC, BCn, PVRTC)
Algorithm
ASTCETC1 / ETC2BCn (DXT)PVRTCBasis Universal (in KTX2)
Color Depth 8-bit, 16-bit, 32-bit (Integer/Float)
Developed by Khronos Group
Released 2010
Magic Bytes
AB 4B 54 58 20 31 31 BB 0D 0A 1A 0A
Full KTX reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser Kodak-K25 KTX
Chrome Chrome
✕ ✕
Firefox Firefox
✕ ✕
Safari Safari
✕ ✕
Edge Edge
✕ ✕
IE IE (Legacy)
✕ ✕
Kodak-K25

Kodak-K25 Strengths

  • Historically significant format tied to the first digital camera to adopt CompactFlash memory
  • Preserves original raw sensor data, allowing modern demosaicing algorithms (via LibRaw) to extract much better image quality than 1996-era software could
Limitations
  • Completely obsolete and deeply proprietary, lacking modern raw format features found in DNG
  • Cannot be natively viewed in web browsers or standard operating system image viewers without specialized decoders
  • Subject to misidentification by automated MIME detection libraries due to structural similarities with standard TIFFs
KTX

KTX Strengths

  • Enables direct-to-GPU texture uploading, drastically reducing load times and CPU overhead in 3D applications
  • Supports complex texture types natively (mipmaps, cubemaps, 3D volumes, texture arrays)
  • Standardized across major Khronos APIs (OpenGL, Vulkan, WebGL) unlike vendor-specific formats like DDS
Limitations
  • Requires custom JavaScript loaders to parse and display on the web
  • Zero native support in consumer image viewers or 2D photo editing software
  • Format fragmentation: a KTX file containing an ASTC payload will fail to render on hardware that only supports BCn compression (KTX2 and Basis Universal solve this)

When to choose which format

Kodak-K25
Use Kodak-K25 when…
  • Vintage Digital Photography Archival
  • Kodak DC25 Camera Restorations
  • Historical Imaging Research
KTX
Use KTX when…
  • Real-time 3D Graphics
  • WebGL / WebGPU Applications
  • Mobile Games
  • Virtual/Augmented Reality (VR/AR)

More comparisons

Kodak-K25 vs ACES → KTX vs ACES → Kodak-K25 vs APNG → KTX vs APNG → Kodak-K25 vs AVCI → KTX vs AVCI → Kodak-K25 vs AVCS → KTX vs AVCS → Kodak-K25 vs AVIF → KTX vs AVIF → All comparisons →
Share this comparison