Free webp to jpg
EN
Image MIME Reference
JPX

JPEG 2000 Part 2 (Extended)

image/jpx
VS

Microsoft Image Extension

image/vnd.mix
MIX

A complete technical comparison of JPEG 2000 Part 2 (Extended) and Microsoft Image Extension — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature JPX MIX
Transparency (Alpha) Yes Yes
Animation Support Yes ✕ No
Progressive Loading Yes ✕ No
HDR Support Yes ✕ No
EXIF Metadata Yes ✕ No
ICC Color Profile Yes Yes
JPEG 2000 Part 2 (Extended)
image/jpx
Extension
.jpx.jpf
Container ISOBMFF / JPX (ISO/IEC 15444-2)
Compression Lossy / Lossless
Algorithm
Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT)
Color Depth 8-bit, 16-bit, 32-bit, 38-bit
Developed by Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG)
Released 2002
Magic Bytes
00 00 00 0C 6A 50 20 20 0D 0A 87 0A ... 66 74 79 70 6A 70 78 20
Full JPX reference →
Microsoft Image Extension
image/vnd.mix
Extension
.mix
Container Microsoft OLE Structured Storage (COM)
Compression Proprietary (Internal JPEG/RLE)
Algorithm
JPEGDeflateProprietary
Color Depth 8-bit, 24-bit, 32-bit (RGBA)
Developed by Microsoft Corporation
Released 1996
Magic Bytes
D0 CF 11 E0 A1 B1 1A E1
Full MIX reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser JPX MIX
Chrome Chrome
✕ ✕
Firefox Firefox
✕ ✕
Safari Safari
✕ ✕
Edge Edge
✕ ✕
IE IE (Legacy)
✕ ✕
JPX

JPX Strengths

  • Removes the color space limitations of baseline JP2, adding native support for CMYK, CIE Lab, and custom vendor color spaces
  • Supports multiple codestreams in a single file, allowing for rich compositing and animation
  • Enables fragmented files where image data and metadata can reside in separate physical files via data references
Limitations
  • Extremely complex specification makes full software implementation rare, leading to compatibility issues
  • Zero web browser support, rendering it unsuitable for public internet distribution
  • Often overkill for standard imaging tasks where baseline JP2 or modern alternatives like AVIF suffice
MIX

MIX Strengths

  • Allowed early consumer software to non-destructively edit complex compositions involving photos, text, and vector clipart
  • Shared an architecture with other Microsoft Office products, enabling deep integration (OLE embedding) into Word and PowerPoint at the time
Limitations
  • Completely proprietary and undocumented, leading to a massive loss of historical data for users who archived their family photos in this project format
  • Requires traversing a complex OLE filesystem just to extract the flattened raster image
  • No support in modern image editors like Photoshop, GIMP, or web browsers

When to choose which format

JPX
Use JPX when…
  • Prepress & Commercial Printing (CMYK)
  • Geospatial Data
  • Archival Preservation
  • Medical Imaging
MIX
Use MIX when…
  • Historical Microsoft Picture It! Projects
  • Microsoft PhotoDraw 2000 Graphics
  • Early 2000s Consumer Digital Scrapbooking

More comparisons

JPX vs ACES → MIX vs ACES → JPX vs APNG → MIX vs APNG → JPX vs AVCI → MIX vs AVCI → JPX vs AVCS → MIX vs AVCS → JPX vs AVIF → MIX vs AVIF → All comparisons →
Share this comparison