Free webp to jpg
EN
Image MIME Reference
JPX

JPEG 2000 Part 2 (Extended)

image/jpx
VS

Khronos Texture

image/ktx
KTX

A complete technical comparison of JPEG 2000 Part 2 (Extended) and Khronos Texture — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature JPX KTX
Transparency (Alpha) Yes Yes
Animation Support Yes ✕ No
Progressive Loading Yes ✕ No
HDR Support Yes Yes
EXIF Metadata Yes ✕ No
ICC Color Profile Yes ✕ No
JPEG 2000 Part 2 (Extended)
image/jpx
Extension
.jpx.jpf
Container ISOBMFF / JPX (ISO/IEC 15444-2)
Compression Lossy / Lossless
Algorithm
Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT)
Color Depth 8-bit, 16-bit, 32-bit, 38-bit
Developed by Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG)
Released 2002
Magic Bytes
00 00 00 0C 6A 50 20 20 0D 0A 87 0A ... 66 74 79 70 6A 70 78 20
Full JPX reference →
Khronos Texture
image/ktx
Extension
.ktx
Container KTX (Khronos Texture 1.1)
Compression Uncompressed / GPU Compressed (ASTC, ETC, BCn, PVRTC)
Algorithm
ASTCETC1 / ETC2BCn (DXT)PVRTCBasis Universal (in KTX2)
Color Depth 8-bit, 16-bit, 32-bit (Integer/Float)
Developed by Khronos Group
Released 2010
Magic Bytes
AB 4B 54 58 20 31 31 BB 0D 0A 1A 0A
Full KTX reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser JPX KTX
Chrome Chrome
✕ ✕
Firefox Firefox
✕ ✕
Safari Safari
✕ ✕
Edge Edge
✕ ✕
IE IE (Legacy)
✕ ✕
JPX

JPX Strengths

  • Removes the color space limitations of baseline JP2, adding native support for CMYK, CIE Lab, and custom vendor color spaces
  • Supports multiple codestreams in a single file, allowing for rich compositing and animation
  • Enables fragmented files where image data and metadata can reside in separate physical files via data references
Limitations
  • Extremely complex specification makes full software implementation rare, leading to compatibility issues
  • Zero web browser support, rendering it unsuitable for public internet distribution
  • Often overkill for standard imaging tasks where baseline JP2 or modern alternatives like AVIF suffice
KTX

KTX Strengths

  • Enables direct-to-GPU texture uploading, drastically reducing load times and CPU overhead in 3D applications
  • Supports complex texture types natively (mipmaps, cubemaps, 3D volumes, texture arrays)
  • Standardized across major Khronos APIs (OpenGL, Vulkan, WebGL) unlike vendor-specific formats like DDS
Limitations
  • Requires custom JavaScript loaders to parse and display on the web
  • Zero native support in consumer image viewers or 2D photo editing software
  • Format fragmentation: a KTX file containing an ASTC payload will fail to render on hardware that only supports BCn compression (KTX2 and Basis Universal solve this)

When to choose which format

JPX
Use JPX when…
  • Prepress & Commercial Printing (CMYK)
  • Geospatial Data
  • Archival Preservation
  • Medical Imaging
KTX
Use KTX when…
  • Real-time 3D Graphics
  • WebGL / WebGPU Applications
  • Mobile Games
  • Virtual/Augmented Reality (VR/AR)

More comparisons

JPX vs ACES → KTX vs ACES → JPX vs APNG → KTX vs APNG → JPX vs AVCI → KTX vs AVCI → JPX vs AVCS → KTX vs AVCS → JPX vs AVIF → KTX vs AVIF → All comparisons →
Share this comparison