Free webp to jpg
Image MIME Reference
CMU-Raster

CMU Window Manager Raster

image/x-cmu-raster
VS

JPEG Stereo Image

image/x-jps
JPS

A complete technical comparison of CMU Window Manager Raster and JPEG Stereo Image — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

JPS wins on browser support

Feature Support

Feature CMU-Raster JPS
Transparency (Alpha) ✕ No ✕ No
Animation Support ✕ No ✕ No
Progressive Loading ✕ No Yes
HDR Support ✕ No ✕ No
EXIF Metadata ✕ No Yes
ICC Color Profile ✕ No Yes
CMU Window Manager Raster
image/x-cmu-raster
Extension
.ras
Container CMU Window Manager Bitmap
Compression Uncompressed
Algorithm
None
Color Depth 1-bit (Monochrome), 8-bit (Indexed/Grayscale)
Developed by Carnegie Mellon University (CMU)
Released 1980s
Magic Bytes
F1 00 40 BB
Full CMU-Raster reference →
JPEG Stereo Image
image/x-jps
Extension
.jps
Container JPEG (JFIF/Exif)
Compression Lossy (JPEG/DCT)
Algorithm
JPEG (Discrete Cosine Transform)
Color Depth 8-bit (Grayscale), 24-bit (RGB)
Developed by Stereoscopic Community (Unofficial Standard)
Released 1990
Magic Bytes
FF D8 FF
Full JPS reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser CMU-Raster JPS
Chrome Chrome
✓ 1
Firefox Firefox
✓ 1
Safari Safari
✓ 1
Edge Edge
✓ 12
IE IE (Legacy)
CMU-Raster

CMU-Raster Strengths

  • Incredibly simple, uncompressed binary structure that was easy for early, memory-constrained UNIX workstations to parse and render
Limitations
  • Completely obsolete and unsupported outside of niche historical command-line tools like Netpbm
  • The shared '.ras' file extension causes frequent file misidentification and system conflicts
  • Lacks all modern imaging features, including metadata, compression, and alpha channel transparency
JPS

JPS Strengths

  • 100% backward compatible with every standard 2D image viewer and web browser (which simply display the two halves side-by-side)
  • Inherits JPEG's excellent lossy compression, resulting in small file sizes ideal for web transmission
  • Extremely easy to generate programmatically by simply stitching two JPEG images side-by-side onto a wider canvas
Limitations
  • Lack of a dedicated metadata standard means viewing software has to guess whether the layout is 'cross-eyed' (right eye left, left eye right) or 'parallel' (left eye left, right eye right), occasionally causing inverted depth
  • Suffers from JPEG compression artifacts, which can break the stereoscopic illusion if compression noise differs between the left and right eyes
  • Superseded in consumer electronics by the MPO (Multi-Picture Object) format, which stacks separate full-resolution JPEGs rather than squishing them side-by-side

When to choose which format

CMU-Raster
Use CMU-Raster when…
  • Historical UNIX / Andrew Project Archival
  • Legacy Academic Computing Research
JPS
Use JPS when…
  • Stereoscopic 3D Photography
  • Virtual Reality (VR) Image Galleries
  • Cross-eye / Parallel Stereograms
Share this comparison