Image MIME Reference
AZV
AirZip Accelerator Image
image/vnd.airzip.accelerator.azv
VS
JPEG Stereo Image
image/x-jps
JPS
A complete technical comparison of AirZip Accelerator Image and JPEG Stereo Image — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
JPS wins on browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | AZV | JPS |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | Yes | Yes |
| HDR Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| EXIF Metadata | ✕ No | Yes |
| ICC Color Profile | ✕ No | Yes |
AirZip Accelerator Image
image/vnd.airzip.accelerator.azv
Extension
.azv
Container
Proprietary AirZip Container
Compression
Lossy (Proprietary) / Lossless (Proprietary)
Algorithm
AirZip Proprietary Compression
Color Depth
8-bit (Indexed), 24-bit (RGB)
Developed by
AirZip, Inc.
Released
1999
Magic Bytes
Unknown (Proprietary)
JPEG Stereo Image
image/x-jps
Extension
.jps
Container
JPEG (JFIF/Exif)
Compression
Lossy (JPEG/DCT)
Algorithm
JPEG (Discrete Cosine Transform)
Color Depth
8-bit (Grayscale), 24-bit (RGB)
Developed by
Stereoscopic Community (Unofficial Standard)
Released
1990
Magic Bytes
FF D8 FF
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | AZV | JPS |
|---|---|---|
|
|
✕ |
✓ 1
|
|
|
✕ |
✓ 1
|
|
|
✕ |
✓ 1
|
|
|
✕ |
✓ 12
|
|
|
✕ |
✓
|
AZV
AZV Strengths
- Historically allowed internet users to browse the web up to 5x faster over 56k dial-up modems by drastically reducing image payload sizes
- Officially registered in the IANA vendor tree, preventing MIME type conflicts on early web proxy servers
Limitations
- Completely obsolete in the modern broadband era
- Closed-source and proprietary, meaning no modern image manipulation libraries (like ImageMagick or libvips) can decode it
- Zero support in standard web browsers
JPS
JPS Strengths
- 100% backward compatible with every standard 2D image viewer and web browser (which simply display the two halves side-by-side)
- Inherits JPEG's excellent lossy compression, resulting in small file sizes ideal for web transmission
- Extremely easy to generate programmatically by simply stitching two JPEG images side-by-side onto a wider canvas
Limitations
- Lack of a dedicated metadata standard means viewing software has to guess whether the layout is 'cross-eyed' (right eye left, left eye right) or 'parallel' (left eye left, right eye right), occasionally causing inverted depth
- Suffers from JPEG compression artifacts, which can break the stereoscopic illusion if compression noise differs between the left and right eyes
- Superseded in consumer electronics by the MPO (Multi-Picture Object) format, which stacks separate full-resolution JPEGs rather than squishing them side-by-side
When to choose which format
AZV
Use AZV when…
- Dial-up Web Acceleration
- Bandwidth Optimization (Historical)
- Legacy Proxy Servers
JPS
Use JPS when…
- Stereoscopic 3D Photography
- Virtual Reality (VR) Image Galleries
- Cross-eye / Parallel Stereograms