Free webp to jpg
Image MIME Reference
AZV

AirZip Accelerator Image

image/vnd.airzip.accelerator.azv
VS

CMU Window Manager Raster

image/x-cmu-raster
CMU-Raster

A complete technical comparison of AirZip Accelerator Image and CMU Window Manager Raster — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature AZV CMU-Raster
Transparency (Alpha) ✕ No ✕ No
Animation Support ✕ No ✕ No
Progressive Loading Yes ✕ No
HDR Support ✕ No ✕ No
EXIF Metadata ✕ No ✕ No
ICC Color Profile ✕ No ✕ No
AirZip Accelerator Image
image/vnd.airzip.accelerator.azv
Extension
.azv
Container Proprietary AirZip Container
Compression Lossy (Proprietary) / Lossless (Proprietary)
Algorithm
AirZip Proprietary Compression
Color Depth 8-bit (Indexed), 24-bit (RGB)
Developed by AirZip, Inc.
Released 1999
Magic Bytes
Unknown (Proprietary)
Full AZV reference →
CMU Window Manager Raster
image/x-cmu-raster
Extension
.ras
Container CMU Window Manager Bitmap
Compression Uncompressed
Algorithm
None
Color Depth 1-bit (Monochrome), 8-bit (Indexed/Grayscale)
Developed by Carnegie Mellon University (CMU)
Released 1980s
Magic Bytes
F1 00 40 BB
Full CMU-Raster reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser AZV CMU-Raster
Chrome Chrome
Firefox Firefox
Safari Safari
Edge Edge
IE IE (Legacy)
AZV

AZV Strengths

  • Historically allowed internet users to browse the web up to 5x faster over 56k dial-up modems by drastically reducing image payload sizes
  • Officially registered in the IANA vendor tree, preventing MIME type conflicts on early web proxy servers
Limitations
  • Completely obsolete in the modern broadband era
  • Closed-source and proprietary, meaning no modern image manipulation libraries (like ImageMagick or libvips) can decode it
  • Zero support in standard web browsers
CMU-Raster

CMU-Raster Strengths

  • Incredibly simple, uncompressed binary structure that was easy for early, memory-constrained UNIX workstations to parse and render
Limitations
  • Completely obsolete and unsupported outside of niche historical command-line tools like Netpbm
  • The shared '.ras' file extension causes frequent file misidentification and system conflicts
  • Lacks all modern imaging features, including metadata, compression, and alpha channel transparency

When to choose which format

AZV
Use AZV when…
  • Dial-up Web Acceleration
  • Bandwidth Optimization (Historical)
  • Legacy Proxy Servers
CMU-Raster
Use CMU-Raster when…
  • Historical UNIX / Andrew Project Archival
  • Legacy Academic Computing Research
Share this comparison