Free webp to jpg
EN
Image MIME Reference
JXL

JPEG XL

image/jxl
VS

Radiance HDR

image/vnd.radiance
Radiance

A complete technical comparison of JPEG XL and Radiance HDR — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

JXL wins on browser support

Feature Support

Feature JXL Radiance
Transparency (Alpha) Yes ✕ No
Animation Support Yes ✕ No
Progressive Loading Yes ✕ No
HDR Support Yes Yes
EXIF Metadata Yes ✕ No
ICC Color Profile Yes ✕ No
JPEG XL
image/jxl
Extension
.jxl
Container ISOBMFF / JPEG XL Codestream
Compression Lossy (VarDCT) / Lossless (Modular)
Algorithm
VarDCT (Variable block-size DCT)Modular (Predictive coding for lossless)
Color Depth 8-bit, 10-bit, 12-bit, 16-bit, 32-bit (Float)
Developed by Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG)
Released 2021
Magic Bytes
FF 0A (Codestream) / 00 00 00 0C 4A 58 4C 20 0D 0A 87 0A (Container)
Full JXL reference →
Radiance HDR
image/vnd.radiance
Extension
.hdr.pic.rgbe.xyze
Container Radiance Information Header
Compression Run-Length Encoding (RLE) / Uncompressed
Algorithm
Adaptive Run-Length Encoding (RLE)
Color Depth 32-bit (8-bit per channel RGB + 8-bit shared Exponent)
Developed by Greg Ward (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory)
Released 1989
Magic Bytes
23 3F 52 41 44 49 41 4E 43 45
Full Radiance reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser JXL Radiance
Chrome Chrome
✕ ✕
Firefox Firefox
✕ ✕
Safari Safari
✓ 17+
 ✕
Edge Edge
✕ ✕
IE IE (Legacy)
✕ ✕
JXL

JXL Strengths

  • Capable of losslessly recompressing legacy JPEG files, saving ~20% space while retaining perfect byte-for-byte restorability
  • Highly superior progressive decoding (Saliency-driven), allowing recognizable images to load extremely fast on slow connections
  • Outperforms WebP and competes favorably with AVIF, especially at high-fidelity settings and for complex textures/photography
  • Royalty-free with an open-source reference implementation (libjxl)
Limitations
  • Google's removal of JXL support from Chrome severely hindered its adoption as a universal web standard
  • Lack of hardware decoding chips compared to video-derived codecs like AVIF (AV1)
  • File parsing logic is complex due to the split between raw codestreams and ISOBMFF containers
Radiance

Radiance Strengths

  • Universally supported by almost every 3D modeling software, renderer, and game engine in existence
  • RGBE encoding offers a brilliant balance between High Dynamic Range capability and small file size (compared to 32-bit float OpenEXR)
  • Simple, easy-to-parse ASCII header followed by straightforward RLE binary data
Limitations
  • Does not support alpha transparency (no way to store an isolated light source with a transparent background)
  • The shared exponent architecture can occasionally introduce banding or color artifacts in extreme edge cases compared to true 16-bit/32-bit floating-point formats like OpenEXR
  • Zero native browser support for 2D viewing

When to choose which format

JXL
Use JXL when…
  • High-End Web Delivery (via Safari/Polyfills)
  • HDR Photography
  • Legacy JPEG Archiving
  • Digital Art & Image Storage
Radiance
Use Radiance when…
  • Image-Based Lighting (IBL)
  • 3D Environment Maps (HDRI Skydomes)
  • Lighting Simulation
  • VFX and CGI Rendering

More comparisons

JXL vs ACES → Radiance vs ACES → JXL vs APNG → Radiance vs APNG → JXL vs AVCI → Radiance vs AVCI → JXL vs AVCS → Radiance vs AVCS → JXL vs AVIF → Radiance vs AVIF → All comparisons →
Share this comparison