Free webp to jpg
EN
Image MIME Reference
JPM

JPEG 2000 Compound Image File Format

image/jpm
VS

X Window Dump (Legacy MIME Alias)

image/x-xwindowdump
XWD

A complete technical comparison of JPEG 2000 Compound Image File Format and X Window Dump (Legacy MIME Alias) — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature JPM XWD
Transparency (Alpha) Yes Yes
Animation Support ✕ No ✕ No
Progressive Loading Yes ✕ No
HDR Support ✕ No ✕ No
EXIF Metadata Yes ✕ No
ICC Color Profile Yes ✕ No
JPEG 2000 Compound Image File Format
image/jpm
Extension
.jpm.jpgm
Container ISOBMFF / JPM (ISO/IEC 15444-6)
Compression Lossy / Lossless / Mixed Raster Content (MRC)
Algorithm
JPEG 2000JBIG2JPEGMMR
Color Depth 1-bit (Text/Masks), 8-bit, 16-bit, 24-bit
Developed by Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG)
Released 2003
Magic Bytes
00 00 00 0C 6A 50 20 20 0D 0A 87 0A ... 66 74 79 70 6A 70 6D 20
Full JPM reference →
X Window Dump (Legacy MIME Alias)
image/x-xwindowdump
Extension
.xwd.wd
Container XWDHeader / XWDFileHeader Structure
Compression Uncompressed
Algorithm
None
Color Depth 8-bit (Indexed), 16-bit (High Color), 24-bit (True Color), 32-bit (True Color with Alpha/Padding)
Developed by MIT / X Consortium (X Window System)
Released 1987
Magic Bytes
00 00 00 64 (Typically indicates a 100-byte header size followed by version)
Full XWD reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser JPM XWD
Chrome Chrome
✕ ✕
Firefox Firefox
✕ ✕
Safari Safari
✕ ✕
Edge Edge
✕ ✕
IE IE (Legacy)
✕ ✕
JPM

JPM Strengths

  • Highly optimized for scanned documents, drastically reducing file sizes without sacrificing the readability of text or the quality of embedded photos
  • Supports multi-page documents within a single file
  • Object-based architecture allows for complex layout representation and independent extraction of elements
Limitations
  • Failed to achieve widespread adoption, largely being overshadowed by PDF/A and DjVu
  • Zero native web browser compatibility
  • Requires complex, specialized software to properly encode and decode the multi-layered MRC structure
XWD

XWD Strengths

  • Provides an exact, raw pixel dump directly from the X11 display server memory without compression overhead
  • Extremely fast for Unix environments to generate during low-level graphical debugging
Limitations
  • Completely uncompressed, resulting in large, bloated file sizes
  • Zero support in web browsers or modern desktop environments without specialized graphics translation tools
  • Verbose legacy MIME strings like 'image/x-xwindowdump' require backend normalization in modern applications

When to choose which format

JPM
Use JPM when…
  • Scanned Document Archiving
  • Mixed Raster Content (MRC) Imaging
  • Digital Libraries
XWD
Use XWD when…
  • X Window System (X11) Display Debugging and Screenshots
  • Legacy Unix/Linux System Administration

More comparisons

JPM vs ACES → XWD vs ACES → JPM vs APNG → XWD vs APNG → JPM vs AVCI → XWD vs AVCI → JPM vs AVCS → XWD vs AVCS → JPM vs AVIF → XWD vs AVIF → All comparisons →
Share this comparison