Image MIME Reference
JPM
JPEG 2000 Compound Image File Format
image/jpm
VS
Sony SRF Raw Image
image/x-sony-srf
Sony-SRF
A complete technical comparison of JPEG 2000 Compound Image File Format and Sony SRF Raw Image — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | JPM | Sony-SRF |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | Yes | ✕ No |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | Yes | ✕ No |
| HDR Support | ✕ No | Yes |
| EXIF Metadata | Yes | Yes |
| ICC Color Profile | Yes | Yes |
JPEG 2000 Compound Image File Format
image/jpm
Extension
.jpm.jpgm
Container
ISOBMFF / JPM (ISO/IEC 15444-6)
Compression
Lossy / Lossless / Mixed Raster Content (MRC)
Algorithm
JPEG 2000JBIG2JPEGMMR
Color Depth
1-bit (Text/Masks), 8-bit, 16-bit, 24-bit
Developed by
Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG)
Released
2003
Magic Bytes
00 00 00 0C 6A 50 20 20 0D 0A 87 0A ... 66 74 79 70 6A 70 6D 20
Sony SRF Raw Image
image/x-sony-srf
Extension
.srf
Container
TIFF-based (Proprietary)
Compression
Uncompressed
Algorithm
None
Color Depth
12-bit (Per Channel)
Developed by
Sony Corporation
Released
2003
Magic Bytes
49 49 2A 00
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | JPM | Sony-SRF |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ | ✕ |
Firefox
|
✕ | ✕ |
Safari
|
✕ | ✕ |
Edge
|
✕ | ✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ | ✕ |
JPM
JPM Strengths
- Highly optimized for scanned documents, drastically reducing file sizes without sacrificing the readability of text or the quality of embedded photos
- Supports multi-page documents within a single file
- Object-based architecture allows for complex layout representation and independent extraction of elements
Limitations
- Failed to achieve widespread adoption, largely being overshadowed by PDF/A and DjVu
- Zero native web browser compatibility
- Requires complex, specialized software to properly encode and decode the multi-layered MRC structure
Sony-SRF
Sony-SRF Strengths
- Retains perfectly raw, unprocessed sensor data from legacy early-2000s cameras, allowing modern raw processors to extract much better dynamic range and color than the camera's original internal JPEG engine could
- Utilizes a standard TIFF container structure, ensuring broad compatibility with community-maintained open-source decoding libraries like LibRaw
Limitations
- Completely obsolete format that has long been abandoned in favor of ARW
- MIME detection via magic bytes is unreliable due to TIFF header spoofing, requiring deeper EXIF inspection for accurate routing
- Cannot be natively viewed in web browsers or standard operating system image viewers without specialized decoders
When to choose which format
JPM
Use JPM when…
- Scanned Document Archiving
- Mixed Raster Content (MRC) Imaging
- Digital Libraries
Sony-SRF
Use Sony-SRF when…
- Legacy Sony Cyber-shot Photography
- Non-destructive Image Post-Processing
- Early 2000s Raw Imaging Archival