Free webp to jpg
EN
Image MIME Reference
JPM

JPEG 2000 Compound Image File Format

image/jpm
VS

QuickTime Image Format

image/x-quicktime
QTIF

A complete technical comparison of JPEG 2000 Compound Image File Format and QuickTime Image Format — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature JPM QTIF
Transparency (Alpha) Yes Yes
Animation Support ✕ No ✕ No
Progressive Loading Yes ✕ No
HDR Support ✕ No ✕ No
EXIF Metadata Yes ✕ No
ICC Color Profile Yes ✕ No
JPEG 2000 Compound Image File Format
image/jpm
Extension
.jpm.jpgm
Container ISOBMFF / JPM (ISO/IEC 15444-6)
Compression Lossy / Lossless / Mixed Raster Content (MRC)
Algorithm
JPEG 2000JBIG2JPEGMMR
Color Depth 1-bit (Text/Masks), 8-bit, 16-bit, 24-bit
Developed by Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG)
Released 2003
Magic Bytes
00 00 00 0C 6A 50 20 20 0D 0A 87 0A ... 66 74 79 70 6A 70 6D 20
Full JPM reference →
QuickTime Image Format
image/x-quicktime
Extension
.qtif.qti.qif
Container QuickTime Atom Container
Compression Varies (JPEG, SMC, Apple Video, Cinepak, Uncompressed)
Algorithm
QuickTime Image Compression Manager (ICM) Codecs
Color Depth 1-bit to 32-bit (Varies depending on the enclosed codec)
Developed by Apple Computer, Inc.
Released 1991
Magic Bytes
Varies (Typically begins with a 32-bit size integer followed by 69 64 73 63 ('idsc'))
Full QTIF reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser JPM QTIF
Chrome Chrome
✕ ✕
Firefox Firefox
✕ ✕
Safari Safari
✕ ✕
Edge Edge
✕ ✕
IE IE (Legacy)
✕ ✕
JPM

JPM Strengths

  • Highly optimized for scanned documents, drastically reducing file sizes without sacrificing the readability of text or the quality of embedded photos
  • Supports multi-page documents within a single file
  • Object-based architecture allows for complex layout representation and independent extraction of elements
Limitations
  • Failed to achieve widespread adoption, largely being overshadowed by PDF/A and DjVu
  • Zero native web browser compatibility
  • Requires complex, specialized software to properly encode and decode the multi-layered MRC structure
QTIF

QTIF Strengths

  • Extremely flexible architecture allowing it to encapsulate virtually any image compression algorithm available on the host machine
  • Supported 32-bit images with alpha channels (transparency) long before PNG became an established standard
Limitations
  • Fundamentally tied to Apple's deprecated QuickTime architecture, rendering the files almost entirely unreadable on modern systems without specialized legacy software or FFmpeg
  • The 'wrapper' nature of the format means that even if a parser can read the QTIF container, it may fail to render the image if it lacks the specific proprietary codec (like Apple SMC) used to compress the pixel data
  • Zero native support in modern web browsers

When to choose which format

JPM
Use JPM when…
  • Scanned Document Archiving
  • Mixed Raster Content (MRC) Imaging
  • Digital Libraries
QTIF
Use QTIF when…
  • Classic Mac OS Applications and Backgrounds
  • QuickTime VR Panorama Textures
  • 1990s CD-ROM Multimedia Assets

More comparisons

JPM vs ACES → QTIF vs ACES → JPM vs APNG → QTIF vs APNG → JPM vs AVCI → QTIF vs AVCI → JPM vs AVCS → QTIF vs AVCS → JPM vs AVIF → QTIF vs AVIF → All comparisons →
Share this comparison