Free webp to jpg
EN
Image MIME Reference
JPM

JPEG 2000 Compound Image File Format

image/jpm
VS

Portable Anymap

image/x-portable-anymap
PNM

A complete technical comparison of JPEG 2000 Compound Image File Format and Portable Anymap — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature JPM PNM
Transparency (Alpha) Yes ✕ No
Animation Support ✕ No ✕ No
Progressive Loading Yes ✕ No
HDR Support ✕ No ✕ No
EXIF Metadata Yes ✕ No
ICC Color Profile Yes ✕ No
JPEG 2000 Compound Image File Format
image/jpm
Extension
.jpm.jpgm
Container ISOBMFF / JPM (ISO/IEC 15444-6)
Compression Lossy / Lossless / Mixed Raster Content (MRC)
Algorithm
JPEG 2000JBIG2JPEGMMR
Color Depth 1-bit (Text/Masks), 8-bit, 16-bit, 24-bit
Developed by Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG)
Released 2003
Magic Bytes
00 00 00 0C 6A 50 20 20 0D 0A 87 0A ... 66 74 79 70 6A 70 6D 20
Full JPM reference →
Portable Anymap
image/x-portable-anymap
Extension
.pnm
Container Netpbm
Compression Uncompressed
Algorithm
None
Color Depth 1-bit (PBM), 8-bit to 16-bit (PGM), 24-bit to 48-bit (PPM)
Developed by Jef Poskanzer (Netpbm Project)
Released 1988
Magic Bytes
50 31, 50 32, 50 33, 50 34, 50 35, or 50 36
Full PNM reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser JPM PNM
Chrome Chrome
✕ ✕
Firefox Firefox
✕ ✕
Safari Safari
✕ ✕
Edge Edge
✕ ✕
IE IE (Legacy)
✕ ✕
JPM

JPM Strengths

  • Highly optimized for scanned documents, drastically reducing file sizes without sacrificing the readability of text or the quality of embedded photos
  • Supports multi-page documents within a single file
  • Object-based architecture allows for complex layout representation and independent extraction of elements
Limitations
  • Failed to achieve widespread adoption, largely being overshadowed by PDF/A and DjVu
  • Zero native web browser compatibility
  • Requires complex, specialized software to properly encode and decode the multi-layered MRC structure
PNM

PNM Strengths

  • Unparalleled simplicity: parsers and writers for PNM files can be written from scratch in C or Python in just a few minutes without relying on external libraries
  • Serves as an excellent foundational teaching tool for computer science students learning about image arrays and raster graphics
  • Flawlessly pipes through Unix command-line utilities for robust automated image processing (via the Netpbm suite)
Limitations
  • Zero compression natively results in astronomical file sizes, making it entirely impractical for web delivery or consumer storage
  • No support for standard metadata formats like EXIF, XMP, or ICC color profiles
  • No native alpha channel support in the classic PNM specification (though the newer PAM format 'P7' addresses this)

When to choose which format

JPM
Use JPM when…
  • Scanned Document Archiving
  • Mixed Raster Content (MRC) Imaging
  • Digital Libraries
PNM
Use PNM when…
  • Unix/Linux Command-Line Image Processing (Netpbm suite)
  • Academic Computer Vision Research
  • Intermediary Format for Image Format Conversion

More comparisons

JPM vs ACES → PNM vs ACES → JPM vs APNG → PNM vs APNG → JPM vs AVCI → PNM vs AVCI → JPM vs AVCS → PNM vs AVCS → JPM vs AVIF → PNM vs AVIF → All comparisons →
Share this comparison