Free webp to jpg
EN
Image MIME Reference
JPM

JPEG 2000 Compound Image File Format

image/jpm
VS

Portable Graymap

image/x-portable-graymap
PGM

A complete technical comparison of JPEG 2000 Compound Image File Format and Portable Graymap — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature JPM PGM
Transparency (Alpha) Yes ✕ No
Animation Support ✕ No ✕ No
Progressive Loading Yes ✕ No
HDR Support ✕ No Yes
EXIF Metadata Yes ✕ No
ICC Color Profile Yes ✕ No
JPEG 2000 Compound Image File Format
image/jpm
Extension
.jpm.jpgm
Container ISOBMFF / JPM (ISO/IEC 15444-6)
Compression Lossy / Lossless / Mixed Raster Content (MRC)
Algorithm
JPEG 2000JBIG2JPEGMMR
Color Depth 1-bit (Text/Masks), 8-bit, 16-bit, 24-bit
Developed by Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG)
Released 2003
Magic Bytes
00 00 00 0C 6A 50 20 20 0D 0A 87 0A ... 66 74 79 70 6A 70 6D 20
Full JPM reference →
Portable Graymap
image/x-portable-graymap
Extension
.pgm
Container Netpbm
Compression Uncompressed
Algorithm
None
Color Depth 8-bit (Grayscale), 16-bit (Grayscale)
Developed by Jef Poskanzer (Netpbm Project)
Released 1988
Magic Bytes
50 32 (ASCII) or 50 35 (Binary)
Full PGM reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser JPM PGM
Chrome Chrome
✕ ✕
Firefox Firefox
✕ ✕
Safari Safari
✕ ✕
Edge Edge
✕ ✕
IE IE (Legacy)
✕ ✕
JPM

JPM Strengths

  • Highly optimized for scanned documents, drastically reducing file sizes without sacrificing the readability of text or the quality of embedded photos
  • Supports multi-page documents within a single file
  • Object-based architecture allows for complex layout representation and independent extraction of elements
Limitations
  • Failed to achieve widespread adoption, largely being overshadowed by PDF/A and DjVu
  • Zero native web browser compatibility
  • Requires complex, specialized software to properly encode and decode the multi-layered MRC structure
PGM

PGM Strengths

  • Extremely simple format allows custom parsers to be written from scratch in minimal time
  • Supports 16-bit precision, making it highly valuable for scientific, medical, and height-map data where 8-bit precision is insufficient
  • ASCII encoding ('P2') allows manual editing and visual inspection of pixel values directly within a text editor
Limitations
  • Strictly limited to grayscale; cannot display color
  • Lack of compression results in massive file sizes, making it entirely impractical for web delivery or consumer storage
  • Does not support alpha transparency or modern metadata structures

When to choose which format

JPM
Use JPM when…
  • Scanned Document Archiving
  • Mixed Raster Content (MRC) Imaging
  • Digital Libraries
PGM
Use PGM when…
  • Computer Vision and Machine Learning Pre-processing
  • Scientific and Medical Image Processing
  • Unix/Linux Command-Line Image Pipelines

More comparisons

JPM vs ACES → PGM vs ACES → JPM vs APNG → PGM vs APNG → JPM vs AVCI → PGM vs AVCI → JPM vs AVCS → PGM vs AVCS → JPM vs AVIF → PGM vs AVIF → All comparisons →
Share this comparison