Free webp to jpg
EN
Image MIME Reference
JPM

JPEG 2000 Compound Image File Format

image/jpm
VS

Nikon Electronic Format

image/x-nikon-nef
Nikon-NEF

A complete technical comparison of JPEG 2000 Compound Image File Format and Nikon Electronic Format — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature JPM Nikon-NEF
Transparency (Alpha) Yes ✕ No
Animation Support ✕ No ✕ No
Progressive Loading Yes ✕ No
HDR Support ✕ No Yes
EXIF Metadata Yes Yes
ICC Color Profile Yes Yes
JPEG 2000 Compound Image File Format
image/jpm
Extension
.jpm.jpgm
Container ISOBMFF / JPM (ISO/IEC 15444-6)
Compression Lossy / Lossless / Mixed Raster Content (MRC)
Algorithm
JPEG 2000JBIG2JPEGMMR
Color Depth 1-bit (Text/Masks), 8-bit, 16-bit, 24-bit
Developed by Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG)
Released 2003
Magic Bytes
00 00 00 0C 6A 50 20 20 0D 0A 87 0A ... 66 74 79 70 6A 70 6D 20
Full JPM reference →
Nikon Electronic Format
image/x-nikon-nef
Extension
.nef
Container TIFF
Compression Uncompressed / Lossless Compressed / Lossy Compressed (High Efficiency)
Algorithm
NoneNikon Proprietary LosslessNikon High Efficiency Lossy
Color Depth 12-bit (Per Channel), 14-bit (Per Channel)
Developed by Nikon Corporation
Released 1999
Magic Bytes
49 49 2A 00 or 4D 4D 00 2A
Full Nikon-NEF reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser JPM Nikon-NEF
Chrome Chrome
✕ ✕
Firefox Firefox
✕ ✕
Safari Safari
✕ ✕
Edge Edge
✕ ✕
IE IE (Legacy)
✕ ✕
JPM

JPM Strengths

  • Highly optimized for scanned documents, drastically reducing file sizes without sacrificing the readability of text or the quality of embedded photos
  • Supports multi-page documents within a single file
  • Object-based architecture allows for complex layout representation and independent extraction of elements
Limitations
  • Failed to achieve widespread adoption, largely being overshadowed by PDF/A and DjVu
  • Zero native web browser compatibility
  • Requires complex, specialized software to properly encode and decode the multi-layered MRC structure
Nikon-NEF

Nikon-NEF Strengths

  • Retains maximum sensor data, allowing extreme recovery of highlights and shadows that would be permanently lost in a JPEG
  • White balance, sharpening, and color profiling are saved as metadata instructions rather than 'baked in', meaning they can be completely altered in post-production without degrading the image
  • Embeds a high-quality JPEG preview inside the raw file for rapid culling and viewing
Limitations
  • Proprietary format means it requires constant updates to raw processing engines every time Nikon releases a new camera model
  • Produces very large file sizes (often 20MB to 50MB+ per image depending on sensor resolution and bit-depth)
  • Cannot be directly embedded into web pages or used in standard HTML/CSS contexts

When to choose which format

JPM
Use JPM when…
  • Scanned Document Archiving
  • Mixed Raster Content (MRC) Imaging
  • Digital Libraries
Nikon-NEF
Use Nikon-NEF when…
  • Professional Digital Photography
  • Non-destructive Image Post-Processing
  • High Dynamic Range (HDR) Imaging Archival

More comparisons

JPM vs ACES → Nikon-NEF vs ACES → JPM vs APNG → Nikon-NEF vs APNG → JPM vs AVCI → Nikon-NEF vs AVCI → JPM vs AVCS → Nikon-NEF vs AVCS → JPM vs AVIF → Nikon-NEF vs AVIF → All comparisons →
Share this comparison