Free webp to jpg
EN
Image MIME Reference
JPM

JPEG 2000 Compound Image File Format

image/jpm
VS

Network FlashPix

image/vnd.net-fpx
Net-FPX

A complete technical comparison of JPEG 2000 Compound Image File Format and Network FlashPix — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature JPM Net-FPX
Transparency (Alpha) Yes Yes
Animation Support ✕ No ✕ No
Progressive Loading Yes Yes
HDR Support ✕ No ✕ No
EXIF Metadata Yes Yes
ICC Color Profile Yes Yes
JPEG 2000 Compound Image File Format
image/jpm
Extension
.jpm.jpgm
Container ISOBMFF / JPM (ISO/IEC 15444-6)
Compression Lossy / Lossless / Mixed Raster Content (MRC)
Algorithm
JPEG 2000JBIG2JPEGMMR
Color Depth 1-bit (Text/Masks), 8-bit, 16-bit, 24-bit
Developed by Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG)
Released 2003
Magic Bytes
00 00 00 0C 6A 50 20 20 0D 0A 87 0A ... 66 74 79 70 6A 70 6D 20
Full JPM reference →
Network FlashPix
image/vnd.net-fpx
Extension
.fpx
Container Microsoft OLE Structured Storage (COM)
Compression JPEG (Lossy) / Uncompressed / Single-color (Solid)
Algorithm
JPEGNone
Color Depth 8-bit (Grayscale/Indexed), 24-bit (RGB), 32-bit (CMYK/RGBA)
Developed by Digital Imaging Group (Kodak, HP, Live Picture, Microsoft)
Released 1996
Magic Bytes
D0 CF 11 E0 A1 B1 1A E1
Full Net-FPX reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser JPM Net-FPX
Chrome Chrome
✕ ✕
Firefox Firefox
✕ ✕
Safari Safari
✕ ✕
Edge Edge
✕ ✕
IE IE (Legacy)
✕ ✕
JPM

JPM Strengths

  • Highly optimized for scanned documents, drastically reducing file sizes without sacrificing the readability of text or the quality of embedded photos
  • Supports multi-page documents within a single file
  • Object-based architecture allows for complex layout representation and independent extraction of elements
Limitations
  • Failed to achieve widespread adoption, largely being overshadowed by PDF/A and DjVu
  • Zero native web browser compatibility
  • Requires complex, specialized software to properly encode and decode the multi-layered MRC structure
Net-FPX

Net-FPX Strengths

  • Revolutionized web imaging in the late 1990s by proving that massive gigapixel images could be navigated seamlessly over 56k dial-up modems
  • Pioneered the tile-based, multi-resolution pyramid concepts that eventually evolved into modern standards like IIIF (International Image Interoperability Framework)
Limitations
  • Completely obsolete, having been replaced by standard JPEG servers and modern tiling formats like Deep Zoom or JPEG 2000/XR
  • Relied on proprietary Java applets or ActiveX controls to render the tiles dynamically in a web browser
  • Extremely complex to parse server-side due to the heavy OLE filesystem container

When to choose which format

JPM
Use JPM when…
  • Scanned Document Archiving
  • Mixed Raster Content (MRC) Imaging
  • Digital Libraries
Net-FPX
Use Net-FPX when…
  • Historical Internet Imaging Protocol (IIP) Streaming
  • Early E-Commerce Deep Zoom Implementations
  • Legacy High-Resolution Image Servers

More comparisons

JPM vs ACES → Net-FPX vs ACES → JPM vs APNG → Net-FPX vs APNG → JPM vs AVCI → Net-FPX vs AVCI → JPM vs AVCS → Net-FPX vs AVCS → JPM vs AVIF → Net-FPX vs AVIF → All comparisons →
Share this comparison