Free webp to jpg
EN
Image MIME Reference
JPM

JPEG 2000 Compound Image File Format

image/jpm
VS

Multi-resolution Seamless Image Database

image/x-mrsid-image
MrSID

A complete technical comparison of JPEG 2000 Compound Image File Format and Multi-resolution Seamless Image Database — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature JPM MrSID
Transparency (Alpha) Yes Yes
Animation Support ✕ No ✕ No
Progressive Loading Yes Yes
HDR Support ✕ No ✕ No
EXIF Metadata Yes Yes
ICC Color Profile Yes Yes
JPEG 2000 Compound Image File Format
image/jpm
Extension
.jpm.jpgm
Container ISOBMFF / JPM (ISO/IEC 15444-6)
Compression Lossy / Lossless / Mixed Raster Content (MRC)
Algorithm
JPEG 2000JBIG2JPEGMMR
Color Depth 1-bit (Text/Masks), 8-bit, 16-bit, 24-bit
Developed by Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG)
Released 2003
Magic Bytes
00 00 00 0C 6A 50 20 20 0D 0A 87 0A ... 66 74 79 70 6A 70 6D 20
Full JPM reference →
Multi-resolution Seamless Image Database
image/x-mrsid-image
Extension
.sid
Container Proprietary MrSID Container
Compression Proprietary Wavelet (Lossy) / Proprietary Wavelet (Lossless)
Algorithm
Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT)
Color Depth 8-bit (Grayscale), 24-bit (RGB), Multi-spectral (Multiple bands)
Developed by Los Alamos National Laboratory / LizardTech (Extensis)
Released 1992
Magic Bytes
6D 73 69 64
Full MrSID reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser JPM MrSID
Chrome Chrome
✕ ✕
Firefox Firefox
✕ ✕
Safari Safari
✕ ✕
Edge Edge
✕ ✕
IE IE (Legacy)
✕ ✕
JPM

JPM Strengths

  • Highly optimized for scanned documents, drastically reducing file sizes without sacrificing the readability of text or the quality of embedded photos
  • Supports multi-page documents within a single file
  • Object-based architecture allows for complex layout representation and independent extraction of elements
Limitations
  • Failed to achieve widespread adoption, largely being overshadowed by PDF/A and DjVu
  • Zero native web browser compatibility
  • Requires complex, specialized software to properly encode and decode the multi-layered MRC structure
MrSID

MrSID Strengths

  • Incredible compression ratios enable multi-gigabyte geographical datasets to be stored on standard hard drives or transmitted easily
  • Multi-resolution architecture means panning and zooming across a massive map is completely fluid, as the system decodes only the visible quadrant at the required zoom level
  • Supports multi-spectral bands critical for remote sensing and agricultural GIS analysis
Limitations
  • Deeply proprietary; creating or decoding MrSID files typically requires expensive commercial software or the proprietary Extensis DSDK
  • Open-source geospatial libraries like GDAL require compiling against the proprietary SDK to legally enable MrSID support, causing licensing headaches for Linux server deployments
  • Not natively viewable on the web without specialized geospatial map servers (like GeoServer or MapServer) tiling the image into PNGs or JPEGs on the fly

When to choose which format

JPM
Use JPM when…
  • Scanned Document Archiving
  • Mixed Raster Content (MRC) Imaging
  • Digital Libraries
MrSID
Use MrSID when…
  • Geographic Information Systems (GIS)
  • Satellite Imagery Archival
  • Aerial Orthophotography Mosaics

More comparisons

JPM vs ACES → MrSID vs ACES → JPM vs APNG → MrSID vs APNG → JPM vs AVCI → MrSID vs AVCI → JPM vs AVCS → MrSID vs AVCS → JPM vs AVIF → MrSID vs AVIF → All comparisons →
Share this comparison