Free webp to jpg
Image MIME Reference
JPEG-XS-Sequence

JPEG XS Image Sequence (HEIF Container)

image/jxss
VS

JPEG Stereo Image

image/x-jps
JPS

A complete technical comparison of JPEG XS Image Sequence (HEIF Container) and JPEG Stereo Image — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

JPS wins on browser support

Feature Support

Feature JPEG-XS-Sequence JPS
Transparency (Alpha) Yes ✕ No
Animation Support Yes ✕ No
Progressive Loading ✕ No Yes
HDR Support Yes ✕ No
EXIF Metadata Yes Yes
ICC Color Profile Yes Yes
JPEG XS Image Sequence (HEIF Container)
image/jxss
Extension
.jxss.jxs
Container HEIF / ISOBMFF (ISO/IEC 23008-12)
Compression Lossy (Visually Lossless) / Mathematically Lossless
Algorithm
JPEG XS (ISO/IEC 21122-1)
Color Depth 8-bit, 10-bit, 12-bit, 14-bit, 16-bit
Developed by Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG)
Released 2019
Magic Bytes
XX XX XX XX 66 74 79 70 6A 78 73 73
Full JPEG-XS-Sequence reference →
JPEG Stereo Image
image/x-jps
Extension
.jps
Container JPEG (JFIF/Exif)
Compression Lossy (JPEG/DCT)
Algorithm
JPEG (Discrete Cosine Transform)
Color Depth 8-bit (Grayscale), 24-bit (RGB)
Developed by Stereoscopic Community (Unofficial Standard)
Released 1990
Magic Bytes
FF D8 FF
Full JPS reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser JPEG-XS-Sequence JPS
Chrome Chrome
✓ 1
Firefox Firefox
✓ 1
Safari Safari
✓ 1
Edge Edge
✓ 12
IE IE (Legacy)
JPEG-XS-Sequence

JPEG-XS-Sequence Strengths

  • Provides sub-millisecond encoding and decoding latency across a video sequence while retaining visually lossless quality
  • Leverages the robust ISOBMFF track structures for accurate frame timing, audio synchronization, and metadata handling
  • Optimized for professional video production and IP broadcasting workflows
Limitations
  • Zero web browser compatibility, limiting its use entirely to professional and industrial hardware workflows
  • Compression ratios are significantly lower than consumer video codecs like HEVC or AV1
  • Extremely niche format that requires highly specialized broadcast hardware or custom software libraries to process
JPS

JPS Strengths

  • 100% backward compatible with every standard 2D image viewer and web browser (which simply display the two halves side-by-side)
  • Inherits JPEG's excellent lossy compression, resulting in small file sizes ideal for web transmission
  • Extremely easy to generate programmatically by simply stitching two JPEG images side-by-side onto a wider canvas
Limitations
  • Lack of a dedicated metadata standard means viewing software has to guess whether the layout is 'cross-eyed' (right eye left, left eye right) or 'parallel' (left eye left, right eye right), occasionally causing inverted depth
  • Suffers from JPEG compression artifacts, which can break the stereoscopic illusion if compression noise differs between the left and right eyes
  • Superseded in consumer electronics by the MPO (Multi-Picture Object) format, which stacks separate full-resolution JPEGs rather than squishing them side-by-side

When to choose which format

JPEG-XS-Sequence
Use JPEG-XS-Sequence when…
  • Live Broadcast Video Snippets
  • Medical Imaging Sequences
  • HDR Burst Photography Archiving
  • Automotive & Drone Video Storage
JPS
Use JPS when…
  • Stereoscopic 3D Photography
  • Virtual Reality (VR) Image Galleries
  • Cross-eye / Parallel Stereograms
Share this comparison