Image MIME Reference
JPEG-XR
JPEG XR (HD Photo)
image/vnd.ms-photo
VS
Wireless Bitmap
image/vnd.wap.wbmp
WBMP
A complete technical comparison of JPEG XR (HD Photo) and Wireless Bitmap — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | JPEG-XR | WBMP |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | Yes | ✕ No |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | Yes | ✕ No |
| HDR Support | Yes | ✕ No |
| EXIF Metadata | Yes | ✕ No |
| ICC Color Profile | Yes | ✕ No |
JPEG XR (HD Photo)
image/vnd.ms-photo
Extension
.jxr.wdp.hdp
Container
TIFF-like Image File Directory (IFD)
Compression
Lossy (Lapped Bi-orthogonal Transform) / Lossless
Algorithm
Lapped Bi-orthogonal Transform (LBT)
Color Depth
8-bit (Grayscale, RGB, CMYK), 16-bit, 32-bit Floating Point (HDR)
Developed by
Microsoft Corporation (later Joint Photographic Experts Group)
Released
2006
Magic Bytes
49 49 BC 01
Wireless Bitmap
image/vnd.wap.wbmp
Extension
.wbmp
Container
WBMP Type 0
Compression
Uncompressed
Algorithm
None
Color Depth
1-bit (Monochrome)
Developed by
WAP Forum (Now Open Mobile Alliance)
Released
1999
Magic Bytes
00 00
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | JPEG-XR | WBMP |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ | ✕ |
Firefox
|
✕ | ✕ |
Safari
|
✕ | ✕ |
Edge
|
✕ | ✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✓
|
✕ |
JPEG-XR
JPEG-XR Strengths
- Excellent support for 16-bit and 32-bit floating-point HDR images without massive file size bloat
- Native support for alpha transparency, which standard JPEG fundamentally lacks
- Computational complexity for decoding/encoding is relatively low, making it hardware-friendly
Limitations
- Suffered a complete failure of adoption in the web browser market outside of Microsoft's ecosystem
- Fully superseded by modern, open formats like WebP, AVIF, and JPEG XL which offer better compression and universal browser support
- Multiple file extensions (.wdp, .hdp, .jxr) and MIME types cause confusion and parsing fragmentation
WBMP
WBMP Strengths
- Extremely low processing overhead made it perfectly suited for the ultra-low-power CPUs of late 1990s mobile devices
- Tightly integrated into the WML (Wireless Markup Language) stack, enabling the first functional mobile internet experiences
Limitations
- Completely obsolete and lacks support in modern operating systems and browsers
- Limited entirely to 1-bit black and white (0 for black, 1 for white) with zero support for grayscale, color, or transparency
- The lack of a strong file header signature makes automated MIME type detection highly unreliable
When to choose which format
JPEG-XR
Use JPEG-XR when…
- Legacy Windows Desktop Backgrounds
- XPS (XML Paper Specification) Documents
- Early High Dynamic Range (HDR) Photography
- DirectX Textures
WBMP
Use WBMP when…
- Legacy WML (Wireless Markup Language) Mobile Sites
- Early Mobile Phone Icons and Operator Logos
- Historical WAP Archival