Image MIME Reference
JPEG-XR
JPEG XR (HD Photo)
image/vnd.ms-photo
VS
RealNetworks RealPix
image/vnd.rn-realpix
RealPix
A complete technical comparison of JPEG XR (HD Photo) and RealNetworks RealPix — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | JPEG-XR | RealPix |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | Yes | Yes |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | Yes |
| Progressive Loading | Yes | Yes |
| HDR Support | Yes | ✕ No |
| EXIF Metadata | Yes | ✕ No |
| ICC Color Profile | Yes | ✕ No |
JPEG XR (HD Photo)
image/vnd.ms-photo
Extension
.jxr.wdp.hdp
Container
TIFF-like Image File Directory (IFD)
Compression
Lossy (Lapped Bi-orthogonal Transform) / Lossless
Algorithm
Lapped Bi-orthogonal Transform (LBT)
Color Depth
8-bit (Grayscale, RGB, CMYK), 16-bit, 32-bit Floating Point (HDR)
Developed by
Microsoft Corporation (later Joint Photographic Experts Group)
Released
2006
Magic Bytes
49 49 BC 01
RealNetworks RealPix
image/vnd.rn-realpix
Extension
.rp
Container
IMFL (XML Markup)
Compression
Uncompressed (Plain Text Markup)
Algorithm
None (Plain Text)
Color Depth
Dependent on referenced images
Developed by
RealNetworks
Released
1998
Magic Bytes
3C 69 6D 66 6C
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | JPEG-XR | RealPix |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ | ✕ |
Firefox
|
✕ | ✕ |
Safari
|
✕ | ✕ |
Edge
|
✕ | ✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✓
|
✕ |
JPEG-XR
JPEG-XR Strengths
- Excellent support for 16-bit and 32-bit floating-point HDR images without massive file size bloat
- Native support for alpha transparency, which standard JPEG fundamentally lacks
- Computational complexity for decoding/encoding is relatively low, making it hardware-friendly
Limitations
- Suffered a complete failure of adoption in the web browser market outside of Microsoft's ecosystem
- Fully superseded by modern, open formats like WebP, AVIF, and JPEG XL which offer better compression and universal browser support
- Multiple file extensions (.wdp, .hdp, .jxr) and MIME types cause confusion and parsing fragmentation
RealPix
RealPix Strengths
- Allowed for 'Ken Burns'-style animated slideshows at a fraction of the bandwidth required for actual video, crucial for 1990s dial-up connections
- Plain text XML architecture made it easy for developers and hobbyists to hand-code complex multimedia presentations
- Perfectly synchronized with RealAudio streams using SMIL-like timing parameters
Limitations
- Completely obsolete and heavily reliant on the proprietary, defunct RealPlayer browser plugin
- Not a true image format, causing confusion when handled by standard image processing libraries which expect binary pixel data
- Lacks modern CSS or HTML5 canvas equivalents without completely rewriting the presentation logic
When to choose which format
JPEG-XR
Use JPEG-XR when…
- Legacy Windows Desktop Backgrounds
- XPS (XML Paper Specification) Documents
- Early High Dynamic Range (HDR) Photography
- DirectX Textures
RealPix
Use RealPix when…
- Historical Dial-up Streaming Presentations
- RealPlayer Slideshows
- Bandwidth-efficient 'Video' Alternatives (late 1990s)