Image MIME Reference
JPEG-XR-(HEIF)
JPEG XR Image (HEIF Container)
image/jxra
VS
North American Presentation Level Protocol Syntax
image/naplps
NAPLPS
A complete technical comparison of JPEG XR Image (HEIF Container) and North American Presentation Level Protocol Syntax — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | JPEG-XR-(HEIF) | NAPLPS |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | Yes | ✕ No |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | Yes |
| Progressive Loading | Yes | Yes |
| HDR Support | Yes | ✕ No |
| EXIF Metadata | Yes | ✕ No |
| ICC Color Profile | Yes | ✕ No |
JPEG XR Image (HEIF Container)
image/jxra
Extension
.jxra
Container
HEIF / ISOBMFF (ISO/IEC 23008-12 / Annex F of ITU-T T.832)
Compression
Lossy / Lossless
Algorithm
JPEG XR (Lapped Biorthogonal Transform)
Color Depth
8-bit, 16-bit, 32-bit (Float)
Developed by
ISO/IEC JTC 1 / ITU-T
Released
2019
Magic Bytes
XX XX XX XX 66 74 79 70 6A 78 72 41
North American Presentation Level Protocol Syntax
image/naplps
Extension
.nap.naplps
Container
NAPLPS Byte Stream
Compression
Uncompressed (Tokenized ASCII Commands)
Algorithm
None (Coordinate encoding)
Color Depth
16-color palette (Indexed from larger color spaces)
Developed by
ANSI / CSA (Based on Canadian CRC's Telidon)
Released
1983
Magic Bytes
1B (Variable / ESC sequences)
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | JPEG-XR-(HEIF) | NAPLPS |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ | ✕ |
Firefox
|
✕ | ✕ |
Safari
|
✕ | ✕ |
Edge
|
✕ | ✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ | ✕ |
JPEG-XR-(HEIF)
JPEG-XR-(HEIF) Strengths
- Combines the deep color (32-bit float) and mathematically lossless compression of JPEG XR with the robust metadata architecture of HEIF
- Allows grouping multiple images, exposure brackets, or focal stacks into a single file collection
Limitations
- Practically non-existent software and operating system support compared to standard HEIC or legacy JPEG XR (.jxr)
- Zero web browser support, rendering it entirely unsuitable for public web deployment
- Eclipsed by modern standards like AVIF and JPEG XL which offer superior compression with much broader industry backing
NAPLPS
NAPLPS Strengths
- Extremely bandwidth-efficient, enabling colorful graphical interfaces over early 300 baud dial-up connections
- Resolution-independent vector scaling allowed the exact same file to be displayed accurately on varied early PC monitors and television sets
Limitations
- Completely obsolete and unsupported by modern web technologies
- Relies heavily on stateful parsing and terminal emulators rather than straightforward file decoding
- Easily misidentified by MIME sniffers as plain text or generic binary streams due to the lack of a standardized file header
When to choose which format
JPEG-XR-(HEIF)
Use JPEG-XR-(HEIF) when…
- Specialized Archival
- Experimental Imaging Workflows
- High Dynamic Range (HDR) Imaging
NAPLPS
Use NAPLPS when…
- 1980s Videotex Services
- Prodigy Online Service Graphics
- Historical BBS Terminal Graphics
- Legacy Teletext Broadcasts