Free webp to jpg
Image MIME Reference
JPEG-XR-(HEIF)

JPEG XR Image (HEIF Container)

image/jxra
VS

Microsoft Document Imaging

image/vnd.ms-modi
MODI

A complete technical comparison of JPEG XR Image (HEIF Container) and Microsoft Document Imaging — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature JPEG-XR-(HEIF) MODI
Transparency (Alpha) Yes ✕ No
Animation Support ✕ No ✕ No
Progressive Loading Yes ✕ No
HDR Support Yes ✕ No
EXIF Metadata Yes ✕ No
ICC Color Profile Yes ✕ No
JPEG XR Image (HEIF Container)
image/jxra
Extension
.jxra
Container HEIF / ISOBMFF (ISO/IEC 23008-12 / Annex F of ITU-T T.832)
Compression Lossy / Lossless
Algorithm
JPEG XR (Lapped Biorthogonal Transform)
Color Depth 8-bit, 16-bit, 32-bit (Float)
Developed by ISO/IEC JTC 1 / ITU-T
Released 2019
Magic Bytes
XX XX XX XX 66 74 79 70 6A 78 72 41
Full JPEG-XR-(HEIF) reference →
Microsoft Document Imaging
image/vnd.ms-modi
Extension
.mdi
Container TIFF Variant
Compression LZW / Proprietary MS Compression
Algorithm
LZW (Modified)
Color Depth 1-bit (Monochrome), 8-bit (Grayscale), 24-bit (RGB)
Developed by Microsoft Corporation
Released 2001
Magic Bytes
49 49 2A 00
Full MODI reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser JPEG-XR-(HEIF) MODI
Chrome Chrome
Firefox Firefox
Safari Safari
Edge Edge
IE IE (Legacy)
JPEG-XR-(HEIF)

JPEG-XR-(HEIF) Strengths

  • Combines the deep color (32-bit float) and mathematically lossless compression of JPEG XR with the robust metadata architecture of HEIF
  • Allows grouping multiple images, exposure brackets, or focal stacks into a single file collection
Limitations
  • Practically non-existent software and operating system support compared to standard HEIC or legacy JPEG XR (.jxr)
  • Zero web browser support, rendering it entirely unsuitable for public web deployment
  • Eclipsed by modern standards like AVIF and JPEG XL which offer superior compression with much broader industry backing
MODI

MODI Strengths

  • Historically provided an excellent all-in-one scanned document format with built-in OCR and annotations before PDF editing became universally accessible
  • Tightly integrated with Microsoft Office and SharePoint workflows in the early 2000s
Limitations
  • Completely proprietary and obsolete; Microsoft abandoned it in favor of standard TIFF and PDF
  • Causes widespread identification conflicts since its file signature is identical to a standard TIFF
  • Extremely difficult to open on modern operating systems without relying on third-party conversion utilities

When to choose which format

JPEG-XR-(HEIF)
Use JPEG-XR-(HEIF) when…
  • Specialized Archival
  • Experimental Imaging Workflows
  • High Dynamic Range (HDR) Imaging
MODI
Use MODI when…
  • Legacy Scanned Document Archival
  • Microsoft Office XP/2003/2007 Workflows
  • Embedded OCR Text Storage
Share this comparison