Image MIME Reference
JPEG-LS
JPEG-LS
image/jls
VS
JPEG Stereo Image
image/x-jps
JPS
A complete technical comparison of JPEG-LS and JPEG Stereo Image — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
JPS wins on browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | JPEG-LS | JPS |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | ✕ No | Yes |
| HDR Support | Yes | ✕ No |
| EXIF Metadata | ✕ No | Yes |
| ICC Color Profile | ✕ No | Yes |
JPEG-LS
image/jls
Extension
.jls.jl
Container
JPEG Bitstream
Compression
Lossless / Near-Lossless (Predictive Coding)
Algorithm
LOCO-I (Low Complexity Lossless Compression for Images)Golomb-Rice Coding
Color Depth
8-bit, 12-bit, 16-bit (Per Channel)
Developed by
Joint Photographic Experts Group (ISO/ITU-T) & HP Labs
Released
1999
Magic Bytes
FF D8 FF F7
JPEG Stereo Image
image/x-jps
Extension
.jps
Container
JPEG (JFIF/Exif)
Compression
Lossy (JPEG/DCT)
Algorithm
JPEG (Discrete Cosine Transform)
Color Depth
8-bit (Grayscale), 24-bit (RGB)
Developed by
Stereoscopic Community (Unofficial Standard)
Released
1990
Magic Bytes
FF D8 FF
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | JPEG-LS | JPS |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ |
✓ 1
|
Firefox
|
✕ |
✓ 1
|
Safari
|
✕ |
✓ 1
|
Edge
|
✕ |
✓ 12
|
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ |
✓
|
JPEG-LS
JPEG-LS Strengths
- Provides state-of-the-art lossless compression ratios for continuous-tone images, often outperforming Lossless JPEG and JPEG 2000
- Extremely fast and computationally inexpensive to encode/decode, requiring no complex floating-point math or DCTs
- Highly resilient in constrained hardware environments, making it ideal for medical equipment and deep-space probes (e.g., Mars rovers)
Limitations
- Zero native support in web browsers or standard consumer operating systems
- Lacks the advanced resolution scalability and progressive decoding features found in JPEG 2000
- Primarily relegated to niche enterprise sectors (healthcare/DICOM and aerospace) rather than consumer adoption
JPS
JPS Strengths
- 100% backward compatible with every standard 2D image viewer and web browser (which simply display the two halves side-by-side)
- Inherits JPEG's excellent lossy compression, resulting in small file sizes ideal for web transmission
- Extremely easy to generate programmatically by simply stitching two JPEG images side-by-side onto a wider canvas
Limitations
- Lack of a dedicated metadata standard means viewing software has to guess whether the layout is 'cross-eyed' (right eye left, left eye right) or 'parallel' (left eye left, right eye right), occasionally causing inverted depth
- Suffers from JPEG compression artifacts, which can break the stereoscopic illusion if compression noise differs between the left and right eyes
- Superseded in consumer electronics by the MPO (Multi-Picture Object) format, which stacks separate full-resolution JPEGs rather than squishing them side-by-side
When to choose which format
JPEG-LS
Use JPEG-LS when…
- Medical Imaging (DICOM Encapsulation)
- Space and Planetary Imaging (NASA/ESA)
- Industrial Machine Vision
- Scientific Archival Storage
JPS
Use JPS when…
- Stereoscopic 3D Photography
- Virtual Reality (VR) Image Galleries
- Cross-eye / Parallel Stereograms