Image MIME Reference
IEF
Image Exchange Format
image/ief
VS
Radiance HDR
image/vnd.radiance
Radiance
A complete technical comparison of Image Exchange Format and Radiance HDR — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | IEF | Radiance |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| HDR Support | ✕ No | Yes |
| EXIF Metadata | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| ICC Color Profile | ✕ No | ✕ No |
Image Exchange Format
image/ief
Extension
.ief
Container
TIFF Class B (TIFF-B)
Compression
Lossless (MH, MR, MMR) / Uncompressed
Algorithm
MHMRMMRUncompressed
Color Depth
1-bit (Monochrome)
Developed by
IETF Network Fax Working Group
Released
1992
Magic Bytes
49 49 2A 00 (Little-endian) / 4D 4D 00 2A (Big-endian)
Radiance HDR
image/vnd.radiance
Extension
.hdr.pic.rgbe.xyze
Container
Radiance Information Header
Compression
Run-Length Encoding (RLE) / Uncompressed
Algorithm
Adaptive Run-Length Encoding (RLE)
Color Depth
32-bit (8-bit per channel RGB + 8-bit shared Exponent)
Developed by
Greg Ward (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory)
Released
1989
Magic Bytes
23 3F 52 41 44 49 41 4E 43 45
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | IEF | Radiance |
|---|---|---|
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
IEF
IEF Strengths
- Provided a standard method for exchanging bi-level fax images during the early days of the Internet
- Supported multi-page documents
- Leveraged the highly resilient and well-documented TIFF container
Limitations
- Completely obsolete and unsupported in modern computing environments
- Strictly limited to 1-bit monochrome data, lacking color or grayscale capabilities
- Magic bytes overlap completely with standard TIFF, making specific filetype detection difficult without parsing internal tags
Radiance
Radiance Strengths
- Universally supported by almost every 3D modeling software, renderer, and game engine in existence
- RGBE encoding offers a brilliant balance between High Dynamic Range capability and small file size (compared to 32-bit float OpenEXR)
- Simple, easy-to-parse ASCII header followed by straightforward RLE binary data
Limitations
- Does not support alpha transparency (no way to store an isolated light source with a transparent background)
- The shared exponent architecture can occasionally introduce banding or color artifacts in extreme edge cases compared to true 16-bit/32-bit floating-point formats like OpenEXR
- Zero native browser support for 2D viewing
When to choose which format
IEF
Use IEF when…
- Legacy Fax Transmissions
- Early Internet Gateways
- Archival
Radiance
Use Radiance when…
- Image-Based Lighting (IBL)
- 3D Environment Maps (HDRI Skydomes)
- Lighting Simulation
- VFX and CGI Rendering