Image MIME Reference
IEF
Image Exchange Format
image/ief
VS
JPEG XR (HD Photo)
image/vnd.ms-photo
JPEG-XR
A complete technical comparison of Image Exchange Format and JPEG XR (HD Photo) — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | IEF | JPEG-XR |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | ✕ No | Yes |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | ✕ No | Yes |
| HDR Support | ✕ No | Yes |
| EXIF Metadata | ✕ No | Yes |
| ICC Color Profile | ✕ No | Yes |
Image Exchange Format
image/ief
Extension
.ief
Container
TIFF Class B (TIFF-B)
Compression
Lossless (MH, MR, MMR) / Uncompressed
Algorithm
MHMRMMRUncompressed
Color Depth
1-bit (Monochrome)
Developed by
IETF Network Fax Working Group
Released
1992
Magic Bytes
49 49 2A 00 (Little-endian) / 4D 4D 00 2A (Big-endian)
JPEG XR (HD Photo)
image/vnd.ms-photo
Extension
.jxr.wdp.hdp
Container
TIFF-like Image File Directory (IFD)
Compression
Lossy (Lapped Bi-orthogonal Transform) / Lossless
Algorithm
Lapped Bi-orthogonal Transform (LBT)
Color Depth
8-bit (Grayscale, RGB, CMYK), 16-bit, 32-bit Floating Point (HDR)
Developed by
Microsoft Corporation (later Joint Photographic Experts Group)
Released
2006
Magic Bytes
49 49 BC 01
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | IEF | JPEG-XR |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ | ✕ |
Firefox
|
✕ | ✕ |
Safari
|
✕ | ✕ |
Edge
|
✕ | ✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ |
✓
|
IEF
IEF Strengths
- Provided a standard method for exchanging bi-level fax images during the early days of the Internet
- Supported multi-page documents
- Leveraged the highly resilient and well-documented TIFF container
Limitations
- Completely obsolete and unsupported in modern computing environments
- Strictly limited to 1-bit monochrome data, lacking color or grayscale capabilities
- Magic bytes overlap completely with standard TIFF, making specific filetype detection difficult without parsing internal tags
JPEG-XR
JPEG-XR Strengths
- Excellent support for 16-bit and 32-bit floating-point HDR images without massive file size bloat
- Native support for alpha transparency, which standard JPEG fundamentally lacks
- Computational complexity for decoding/encoding is relatively low, making it hardware-friendly
Limitations
- Suffered a complete failure of adoption in the web browser market outside of Microsoft's ecosystem
- Fully superseded by modern, open formats like WebP, AVIF, and JPEG XL which offer better compression and universal browser support
- Multiple file extensions (.wdp, .hdp, .jxr) and MIME types cause confusion and parsing fragmentation
When to choose which format
IEF
Use IEF when…
- Legacy Fax Transmissions
- Early Internet Gateways
- Archival
JPEG-XR
Use JPEG-XR when…
- Legacy Windows Desktop Backgrounds
- XPS (XML Paper Specification) Documents
- Early High Dynamic Range (HDR) Photography
- DirectX Textures