Image MIME Reference
ICO
Windows Icon (Legacy MIME)
image/x-icon
VS
JPEG XR (HD Photo)
image/vnd.ms-photo
JPEG-XR
A complete technical comparison of Windows Icon (Legacy MIME) and JPEG XR (HD Photo) — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
ICO wins on browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | ICO | JPEG-XR |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | Yes | Yes |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | ✕ No | Yes |
| HDR Support | ✕ No | Yes |
| EXIF Metadata | ✕ No | Yes |
| ICC Color Profile | ✕ No | Yes |
Windows Icon (Legacy MIME)
image/x-icon
Extension
.ico
Container
ICO Directory Structure
Compression
Uncompressed (DIB/BMP) / Deflate (Embedded PNG)
Algorithm
NoneDeflate (via PNG)
Color Depth
1-bit, 4-bit, 8-bit, 24-bit (True Color), 32-bit (RGBA)
Developed by
Microsoft Corporation
Released
1985
Magic Bytes
00 00 01 00
JPEG XR (HD Photo)
image/vnd.ms-photo
Extension
.jxr.wdp.hdp
Container
TIFF-like Image File Directory (IFD)
Compression
Lossy (Lapped Bi-orthogonal Transform) / Lossless
Algorithm
Lapped Bi-orthogonal Transform (LBT)
Color Depth
8-bit (Grayscale, RGB, CMYK), 16-bit, 32-bit Floating Point (HDR)
Developed by
Microsoft Corporation (later Joint Photographic Experts Group)
Released
2006
Magic Bytes
49 49 BC 01
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | ICO | JPEG-XR |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✓ 1
|
✕ |
Firefox
|
✓ 1
|
✕ |
Safari
|
✓ 1
|
✕ |
Edge
|
✓ 12
|
✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✓
|
✓
|
ICO
ICO Strengths
- Universally supported by every web browser in existence for website favicons
- Packs multiple resolutions into a single file, eliminating the need to serve different files for the taskbar vs. the desktop
- Modern support for embedded PNGs (since Windows Vista) allows for excellent 32-bit transparency (alpha channels) and drastically reduced file sizes
Limitations
- Internal file structure is convoluted due to decades of legacy cruft, such as the requirement for BMP data to lack a standard file header but double the height property for an archaic XOR/AND mask
- Larger file size compared to a single optimized PNG or SVG, as it literally stores the same image multiple times at different scales
- The MIME type landscape is highly fragmented (x-icon vs. vnd.microsoft.icon), causing occasional caching or strict-MIME validation errors on restrictive servers
JPEG-XR
JPEG-XR Strengths
- Excellent support for 16-bit and 32-bit floating-point HDR images without massive file size bloat
- Native support for alpha transparency, which standard JPEG fundamentally lacks
- Computational complexity for decoding/encoding is relatively low, making it hardware-friendly
Limitations
- Suffered a complete failure of adoption in the web browser market outside of Microsoft's ecosystem
- Fully superseded by modern, open formats like WebP, AVIF, and JPEG XL which offer better compression and universal browser support
- Multiple file extensions (.wdp, .hdp, .jxr) and MIME types cause confusion and parsing fragmentation
When to choose which format
ICO
Use ICO when…
- Website Favicons (favicon.ico)
- Windows Application Executable Icons (.exe)
- Desktop Shortcut Icons
JPEG-XR
Use JPEG-XR when…
- Legacy Windows Desktop Backgrounds
- XPS (XML Paper Specification) Documents
- Early High Dynamic Range (HDR) Photography
- DirectX Textures