Image MIME Reference
HTJ2K-(JPH)
High-Throughput JPEG 2000 Image
image/jph
VS
JPEG XR Image (HEIF Container)
image/jxra
JPEG-XR-(HEIF)
A complete technical comparison of High-Throughput JPEG 2000 Image and JPEG XR Image (HEIF Container) — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | HTJ2K-(JPH) | JPEG-XR-(HEIF) |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | Yes | Yes |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | Yes | Yes |
| HDR Support | Yes | Yes |
| EXIF Metadata | Yes | Yes |
| ICC Color Profile | Yes | Yes |
High-Throughput JPEG 2000 Image
image/jph
Extension
.jph
Container
JPH (ISO/IEC 15444-15)
Compression
Lossy / Lossless
Algorithm
High-Throughput JPEG 2000 (HTJ2K)
Color Depth
8-bit, 16-bit, 32-bit, 38-bit
Developed by
Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG)
Released
2019
Magic Bytes
00 00 00 0C 6A 50 20 20 0D 0A 87 0A ... 66 74 79 70 6A 70 68 20
JPEG XR Image (HEIF Container)
image/jxra
Extension
.jxra
Container
HEIF / ISOBMFF (ISO/IEC 23008-12 / Annex F of ITU-T T.832)
Compression
Lossy / Lossless
Algorithm
JPEG XR (Lapped Biorthogonal Transform)
Color Depth
8-bit, 16-bit, 32-bit (Float)
Developed by
ISO/IEC JTC 1 / ITU-T
Released
2019
Magic Bytes
XX XX XX XX 66 74 79 70 6A 78 72 41
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | HTJ2K-(JPH) | JPEG-XR-(HEIF) |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ | ✕ |
Firefox
|
✕ | ✕ |
Safari
|
✕ | ✕ |
Edge
|
✕ | ✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ | ✕ |
HTJ2K-(JPH)
HTJ2K-(JPH) Strengths
- Delivers orders of magnitude faster encoding and decoding than standard JPEG 2000 by utilizing a new, parallelizable block coder
- Supports mathematically lossless and lossy compression within the same codestream architecture
- Allows for resolution scalability, progressive decoding, and region-of-interest extraction without needing to decode the entire image
Limitations
- Zero native web browser support, requiring specialized libraries, API conversions, or WebAssembly (like OpenJPH.js) for web deployment
- Lack of broad consumer awareness, keeping it confined to professional, medical, and scientific workflows
- Requires more advanced software ecosystems to decode than ubiquitous formats like JPEG or WebP
JPEG-XR-(HEIF)
JPEG-XR-(HEIF) Strengths
- Combines the deep color (32-bit float) and mathematically lossless compression of JPEG XR with the robust metadata architecture of HEIF
- Allows grouping multiple images, exposure brackets, or focal stacks into a single file collection
Limitations
- Practically non-existent software and operating system support compared to standard HEIC or legacy JPEG XR (.jxr)
- Zero web browser support, rendering it entirely unsuitable for public web deployment
- Eclipsed by modern standards like AVIF and JPEG XL which offer superior compression with much broader industry backing
When to choose which format
HTJ2K-(JPH)
Use HTJ2K-(JPH) when…
- Medical Imaging (DICOM)
- Geospatial Data
- Digital Cinema
- Professional Archiving
JPEG-XR-(HEIF)
Use JPEG-XR-(HEIF) when…
- Specialized Archival
- Experimental Imaging Workflows
- High Dynamic Range (HDR) Imaging