Image MIME Reference
HTJ2K-(JPH)
High-Throughput JPEG 2000 Image
image/jph
VS
JPEG XR (HD Photo)
image/vnd.ms-photo
JPEG-XR
A complete technical comparison of High-Throughput JPEG 2000 Image and JPEG XR (HD Photo) — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | HTJ2K-(JPH) | JPEG-XR |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | Yes | Yes |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | Yes | Yes |
| HDR Support | Yes | Yes |
| EXIF Metadata | Yes | Yes |
| ICC Color Profile | Yes | Yes |
High-Throughput JPEG 2000 Image
image/jph
Extension
.jph
Container
JPH (ISO/IEC 15444-15)
Compression
Lossy / Lossless
Algorithm
High-Throughput JPEG 2000 (HTJ2K)
Color Depth
8-bit, 16-bit, 32-bit, 38-bit
Developed by
Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG)
Released
2019
Magic Bytes
00 00 00 0C 6A 50 20 20 0D 0A 87 0A ... 66 74 79 70 6A 70 68 20
JPEG XR (HD Photo)
image/vnd.ms-photo
Extension
.jxr.wdp.hdp
Container
TIFF-like Image File Directory (IFD)
Compression
Lossy (Lapped Bi-orthogonal Transform) / Lossless
Algorithm
Lapped Bi-orthogonal Transform (LBT)
Color Depth
8-bit (Grayscale, RGB, CMYK), 16-bit, 32-bit Floating Point (HDR)
Developed by
Microsoft Corporation (later Joint Photographic Experts Group)
Released
2006
Magic Bytes
49 49 BC 01
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | HTJ2K-(JPH) | JPEG-XR |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ | ✕ |
Firefox
|
✕ | ✕ |
Safari
|
✕ | ✕ |
Edge
|
✕ | ✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ |
✓
|
HTJ2K-(JPH)
HTJ2K-(JPH) Strengths
- Delivers orders of magnitude faster encoding and decoding than standard JPEG 2000 by utilizing a new, parallelizable block coder
- Supports mathematically lossless and lossy compression within the same codestream architecture
- Allows for resolution scalability, progressive decoding, and region-of-interest extraction without needing to decode the entire image
Limitations
- Zero native web browser support, requiring specialized libraries, API conversions, or WebAssembly (like OpenJPH.js) for web deployment
- Lack of broad consumer awareness, keeping it confined to professional, medical, and scientific workflows
- Requires more advanced software ecosystems to decode than ubiquitous formats like JPEG or WebP
JPEG-XR
JPEG-XR Strengths
- Excellent support for 16-bit and 32-bit floating-point HDR images without massive file size bloat
- Native support for alpha transparency, which standard JPEG fundamentally lacks
- Computational complexity for decoding/encoding is relatively low, making it hardware-friendly
Limitations
- Suffered a complete failure of adoption in the web browser market outside of Microsoft's ecosystem
- Fully superseded by modern, open formats like WebP, AVIF, and JPEG XL which offer better compression and universal browser support
- Multiple file extensions (.wdp, .hdp, .jxr) and MIME types cause confusion and parsing fragmentation
When to choose which format
HTJ2K-(JPH)
Use HTJ2K-(JPH) when…
- Medical Imaging (DICOM)
- Geospatial Data
- Digital Cinema
- Professional Archiving
JPEG-XR
Use JPEG-XR when…
- Legacy Windows Desktop Backgrounds
- XPS (XML Paper Specification) Documents
- Early High Dynamic Range (HDR) Photography
- DirectX Textures