Free webp to jpg
Image MIME Reference
HSJ2

JPEG 2000 Image Sequence (Obsolete)

image/hsj2
VS

JPEG Stereo Image

image/x-jps
JPS

A complete technical comparison of JPEG 2000 Image Sequence (Obsolete) and JPEG Stereo Image — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

JPS wins on browser support

Feature Support

Feature HSJ2 JPS
Transparency (Alpha) Yes ✕ No
Animation Support Yes ✕ No
Progressive Loading Yes Yes
HDR Support Yes ✕ No
EXIF Metadata Yes Yes
ICC Color Profile Yes Yes
JPEG 2000 Image Sequence (Obsolete)
image/hsj2
Extension
.hsj2
Container HEIF / ISOBMFF (ISO/IEC 15444-16 Obsolete)
Compression Lossy / Lossless
Algorithm
Motion JPEG 2000 (ISO/IEC 15444-3)
Color Depth 8-bit, 10-bit, 12-bit, 16-bit
Developed by ISO/IEC JTC 1 / ITU-T
Released 2019
Magic Bytes
XX XX XX XX 66 74 79 70 68 73 6A 32
Full HSJ2 reference →
JPEG Stereo Image
image/x-jps
Extension
.jps
Container JPEG (JFIF/Exif)
Compression Lossy (JPEG/DCT)
Algorithm
JPEG (Discrete Cosine Transform)
Color Depth 8-bit (Grayscale), 24-bit (RGB)
Developed by Stereoscopic Community (Unofficial Standard)
Released 1990
Magic Bytes
FF D8 FF
Full JPS reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser HSJ2 JPS
Chrome Chrome
✓ 1
Firefox Firefox
✓ 1
Safari Safari
✓ 1
Edge Edge
✓ 12
IE IE (Legacy)
HSJ2

HSJ2 Strengths

  • Historically attempted to combine Motion JPEG 2000 sequences with the flexible metadata capabilities of the HEIF container
  • Supported mathematically lossless compression and scalable wavelet decoding
Limitations
  • Officially deprecated by the standardization body (ISO/IEC JTC 1)
  • Completely superseded by image/hej2k, rendering hsj2 files obsolete for any new development or archiving
  • Zero web browser compatibility and negligible modern software support
JPS

JPS Strengths

  • 100% backward compatible with every standard 2D image viewer and web browser (which simply display the two halves side-by-side)
  • Inherits JPEG's excellent lossy compression, resulting in small file sizes ideal for web transmission
  • Extremely easy to generate programmatically by simply stitching two JPEG images side-by-side onto a wider canvas
Limitations
  • Lack of a dedicated metadata standard means viewing software has to guess whether the layout is 'cross-eyed' (right eye left, left eye right) or 'parallel' (left eye left, right eye right), occasionally causing inverted depth
  • Suffers from JPEG compression artifacts, which can break the stereoscopic illusion if compression noise differs between the left and right eyes
  • Superseded in consumer electronics by the MPO (Multi-Picture Object) format, which stacks separate full-resolution JPEGs rather than squishing them side-by-side

When to choose which format

HSJ2
Use HSJ2 when…
  • Legacy Archival
  • Deprecated Workflows
JPS
Use JPS when…
  • Stereoscopic 3D Photography
  • Virtual Reality (VR) Image Galleries
  • Cross-eye / Parallel Stereograms
Share this comparison