Free webp to jpg
Image MIME Reference
HEIF-Sequence

High Efficiency Image File Format Sequence

image/heif-sequence
VS

JPEG Stereo Image

image/x-jps
JPS

A complete technical comparison of High Efficiency Image File Format Sequence and JPEG Stereo Image — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

JPS wins on browser support

Feature Support

Feature HEIF-Sequence JPS
Transparency (Alpha) Yes ✕ No
Animation Support Yes ✕ No
Progressive Loading ✕ No Yes
HDR Support Yes ✕ No
EXIF Metadata Yes Yes
ICC Color Profile Yes Yes
High Efficiency Image File Format Sequence
image/heif-sequence
Extension
.heifs.heif.hif
Container HEIF / ISOBMFF (ISO/IEC 14496-12)
Compression Lossy / Lossless
Algorithm
Codec Agnostic (HEVC, AVC, JPEG, AV1)
Color Depth 8-bit, 10-bit, 12-bit, 16-bit
Developed by Moving Picture Experts Group (MPEG)
Released 2015
Magic Bytes
XX XX XX XX 66 74 79 70 6D 73 66 31
Full HEIF-Sequence reference →
JPEG Stereo Image
image/x-jps
Extension
.jps
Container JPEG (JFIF/Exif)
Compression Lossy (JPEG/DCT)
Algorithm
JPEG (Discrete Cosine Transform)
Color Depth 8-bit (Grayscale), 24-bit (RGB)
Developed by Stereoscopic Community (Unofficial Standard)
Released 1990
Magic Bytes
FF D8 FF
Full JPS reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser HEIF-Sequence JPS
Chrome Chrome
✓ 1
Firefox Firefox
✓ 1
Safari Safari
✓ 1
Edge Edge
✓ 12
IE IE (Legacy)
HEIF-Sequence

HEIF-Sequence Strengths

  • Codec-agnostic container allows for extreme flexibility when storing multi-frame photographic data
  • Maintains the space-saving benefits of ISOBMFF shared frame data blocks
  • Excellent for archiving computational photography workloads like exposure brackets or focal stacks
Limitations
  • Codec ambiguity means a decoder might be able to parse the container but fail to decode the underlying pixels
  • Zero native web browser support
  • Complex container structure requires specialized parsing libraries to extract individual frames
JPS

JPS Strengths

  • 100% backward compatible with every standard 2D image viewer and web browser (which simply display the two halves side-by-side)
  • Inherits JPEG's excellent lossy compression, resulting in small file sizes ideal for web transmission
  • Extremely easy to generate programmatically by simply stitching two JPEG images side-by-side onto a wider canvas
Limitations
  • Lack of a dedicated metadata standard means viewing software has to guess whether the layout is 'cross-eyed' (right eye left, left eye right) or 'parallel' (left eye left, right eye right), occasionally causing inverted depth
  • Suffers from JPEG compression artifacts, which can break the stereoscopic illusion if compression noise differs between the left and right eyes
  • Superseded in consumer electronics by the MPO (Multi-Picture Object) format, which stacks separate full-resolution JPEGs rather than squishing them side-by-side

When to choose which format

HEIF-Sequence
Use HEIF-Sequence when…
  • Burst Photography
  • Focal Stacking
  • Exposure Bracketing
  • Time-Lapse Data
JPS
Use JPS when…
  • Stereoscopic 3D Photography
  • Virtual Reality (VR) Image Galleries
  • Cross-eye / Parallel Stereograms
Share this comparison