Image MIME Reference
HEIC
High Efficiency Image Container
image/heic
VS
JPEG Stereo Image
image/x-jps
JPS
A complete technical comparison of High Efficiency Image Container and JPEG Stereo Image — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
JPS wins on browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | HEIC | JPS |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | Yes | ✕ No |
| Animation Support | Yes | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | ✕ No | Yes |
| HDR Support | Yes | ✕ No |
| EXIF Metadata | Yes | Yes |
| ICC Color Profile | Yes | Yes |
High Efficiency Image Container
image/heic
Extension
.heic
Container
HEIF / ISOBMFF
Compression
Lossy / Lossless
Algorithm
HEVC (H.265)
Color Depth
8-bit, 10-bit, 12-bit, 16-bit
Developed by
MPEG (Standard) / Apple (Adoption)
Released
2017
Magic Bytes
XX XX XX XX 66 74 79 70 68 65 69 63
JPEG Stereo Image
image/x-jps
Extension
.jps
Container
JPEG (JFIF/Exif)
Compression
Lossy (JPEG/DCT)
Algorithm
JPEG (Discrete Cosine Transform)
Color Depth
8-bit (Grayscale), 24-bit (RGB)
Developed by
Stereoscopic Community (Unofficial Standard)
Released
1990
Magic Bytes
FF D8 FF
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | HEIC | JPS |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ |
✓ 1
|
Firefox
|
✕ |
✓ 1
|
Safari
|
✓ 11+
|
✓ 1
|
Edge
|
✕ |
✓ 12
|
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ |
✓
|
HEIC
HEIC Strengths
- Exceptional compression efficiency — stores images at roughly half the file size of JPEG with equal or better visual quality
- Natively supports modern photography features like depth maps, 16-bit color, HDR, and alpha channel transparency
- Can store image bursts, focal stacks, and animations (Live Photos) within a single file
Limitations
- Heavily encumbered by software patents, leading to very poor adoption outside the Apple ecosystem
- Not supported by standard web browsers (except Safari), requiring server-side or client-side conversion for web delivery
- Windows requires downloading a separate (often paid) extension from the Microsoft Store to view natively
JPS
JPS Strengths
- 100% backward compatible with every standard 2D image viewer and web browser (which simply display the two halves side-by-side)
- Inherits JPEG's excellent lossy compression, resulting in small file sizes ideal for web transmission
- Extremely easy to generate programmatically by simply stitching two JPEG images side-by-side onto a wider canvas
Limitations
- Lack of a dedicated metadata standard means viewing software has to guess whether the layout is 'cross-eyed' (right eye left, left eye right) or 'parallel' (left eye left, right eye right), occasionally causing inverted depth
- Suffers from JPEG compression artifacts, which can break the stereoscopic illusion if compression noise differs between the left and right eyes
- Superseded in consumer electronics by the MPO (Multi-Picture Object) format, which stacks separate full-resolution JPEGs rather than squishing them side-by-side
When to choose which format
HEIC
Use HEIC when…
- iOS / iPhone Photography
- macOS Ecosystem
- High-Quality Image Archiving
JPS
Use JPS when…
- Stereoscopic 3D Photography
- Virtual Reality (VR) Image Galleries
- Cross-eye / Parallel Stereograms