Image MIME Reference
FITS
Flexible Image Transport System
image/fits
VS
JPEG Stereo Image
image/x-jps
JPS
A complete technical comparison of Flexible Image Transport System and JPEG Stereo Image — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
JPS wins on browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | FITS | JPS |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | ✕ No | Yes |
| HDR Support | Yes | ✕ No |
| EXIF Metadata | ✕ No | Yes |
| ICC Color Profile | ✕ No | Yes |
Flexible Image Transport System
image/fits
Extension
.fits.fit.fts
Container
FITS
Compression
Uncompressed / Tile Compressed (Rice, GZIP)
Algorithm
UncompressedRiceGZIPHcompress
Color Depth
8-bit, 16-bit, 32-bit, 64-bit (Float/Double)
Developed by
IAU FITS Working Group / NASA
Released
1981
Magic Bytes
53 49 4D 50 4C 45 20 20 3D 20
JPEG Stereo Image
image/x-jps
Extension
.jps
Container
JPEG (JFIF/Exif)
Compression
Lossy (JPEG/DCT)
Algorithm
JPEG (Discrete Cosine Transform)
Color Depth
8-bit (Grayscale), 24-bit (RGB)
Developed by
Stereoscopic Community (Unofficial Standard)
Released
1990
Magic Bytes
FF D8 FF
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | FITS | JPS |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ |
✓ 1
|
Firefox
|
✕ |
✓ 1
|
Safari
|
✕ |
✓ 1
|
Edge
|
✕ |
✓ 12
|
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ |
✓
|
FITS
FITS Strengths
- The undisputed global standard for archiving and sharing astronomical data
- Self-documenting: Headers are written in plain ASCII, ensuring data is readable decades later regardless of software
- Supports incredibly high dynamic range, N-dimensional arrays, and complex binary tables
Limitations
- No support in standard consumer software or web browsers
- Uncompressed raw FITS files from modern telescopes can be excessively large
- Does not use standard metadata models like EXIF or XMP, requiring specialized parsers
JPS
JPS Strengths
- 100% backward compatible with every standard 2D image viewer and web browser (which simply display the two halves side-by-side)
- Inherits JPEG's excellent lossy compression, resulting in small file sizes ideal for web transmission
- Extremely easy to generate programmatically by simply stitching two JPEG images side-by-side onto a wider canvas
Limitations
- Lack of a dedicated metadata standard means viewing software has to guess whether the layout is 'cross-eyed' (right eye left, left eye right) or 'parallel' (left eye left, right eye right), occasionally causing inverted depth
- Suffers from JPEG compression artifacts, which can break the stereoscopic illusion if compression noise differs between the left and right eyes
- Superseded in consumer electronics by the MPO (Multi-Picture Object) format, which stacks separate full-resolution JPEGs rather than squishing them side-by-side
When to choose which format
FITS
Use FITS when…
- Astronomy & Astrophysics
- Space Telescope Data (Hubble, JWST)
- Scientific Data Archiving
- Spectroscopy
JPS
Use JPS when…
- Stereoscopic 3D Photography
- Virtual Reality (VR) Image Galleries
- Cross-eye / Parallel Stereograms