Free webp to jpg
Image MIME Reference
FastBid

FastBid Sheet

image/vnd.fastbidsheet
VS

JPEG 2000 Compound Image File Format

image/jpm
JPM

A complete technical comparison of FastBid Sheet and JPEG 2000 Compound Image File Format — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature FastBid JPM
Transparency (Alpha) ✕ No Yes
Animation Support ✕ No ✕ No
Progressive Loading ✕ No Yes
HDR Support ✕ No ✕ No
EXIF Metadata ✕ No Yes
ICC Color Profile ✕ No Yes
FastBid Sheet
image/vnd.fastbidsheet
Extension
.fbs
Container Proprietary FastBid Container
Compression Proprietary
Algorithm
Unknown
Color Depth Unknown
Developed by FastBid, Inc. (Scott Becker)
Released Late 1990s
Magic Bytes
Unknown (Proprietary)
Full FastBid reference →
JPEG 2000 Compound Image File Format
image/jpm
Extension
.jpm.jpgm
Container ISOBMFF / JPM (ISO/IEC 15444-6)
Compression Lossy / Lossless / Mixed Raster Content (MRC)
Algorithm
JPEG 2000JBIG2JPEGMMR
Color Depth 1-bit (Text/Masks), 8-bit, 16-bit, 24-bit
Developed by Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG)
Released 2003
Magic Bytes
00 00 00 0C 6A 50 20 20 0D 0A 87 0A ... 66 74 79 70 6A 70 6D 20
Full JPM reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser FastBid JPM
Chrome Chrome
Firefox Firefox
Safari Safari
Edge Edge
IE IE (Legacy)
FastBid

FastBid Strengths

  • Historically allowed the FastBid application to securely associate and load proprietary construction plans within its ecosystem
Limitations
  • Completely obsolete and unsupported in modern software environments
  • The official IANA registration of the .fbs extension causes widespread false positives, breaking modern parsers, text editors, and AI SDKs attempting to read FlatBuffers schemas
JPM

JPM Strengths

  • Highly optimized for scanned documents, drastically reducing file sizes without sacrificing the readability of text or the quality of embedded photos
  • Supports multi-page documents within a single file
  • Object-based architecture allows for complex layout representation and independent extraction of elements
Limitations
  • Failed to achieve widespread adoption, largely being overshadowed by PDF/A and DjVu
  • Zero native web browser compatibility
  • Requires complex, specialized software to properly encode and decode the multi-layered MRC structure

When to choose which format

FastBid
Use FastBid when…
  • Legacy Construction Blueprints
  • FastBid Estimating Software
  • Causing .fbs MIME Type Conflicts (FlatBuffers)
JPM
Use JPM when…
  • Scanned Document Archiving
  • Mixed Raster Content (MRC) Imaging
  • Digital Libraries
Share this comparison