Free webp to jpg
Image MIME Reference
FastBid

FastBid Sheet

image/vnd.fastbidsheet
VS

JPEG XR (HD Photo)

image/vnd.ms-photo
JPEG-XR

A complete technical comparison of FastBid Sheet and JPEG XR (HD Photo) — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature FastBid JPEG-XR
Transparency (Alpha) ✕ No Yes
Animation Support ✕ No ✕ No
Progressive Loading ✕ No Yes
HDR Support ✕ No Yes
EXIF Metadata ✕ No Yes
ICC Color Profile ✕ No Yes
FastBid Sheet
image/vnd.fastbidsheet
Extension
.fbs
Container Proprietary FastBid Container
Compression Proprietary
Algorithm
Unknown
Color Depth Unknown
Developed by FastBid, Inc. (Scott Becker)
Released Late 1990s
Magic Bytes
Unknown (Proprietary)
Full FastBid reference →
JPEG XR (HD Photo)
image/vnd.ms-photo
Extension
.jxr.wdp.hdp
Container TIFF-like Image File Directory (IFD)
Compression Lossy (Lapped Bi-orthogonal Transform) / Lossless
Algorithm
Lapped Bi-orthogonal Transform (LBT)
Color Depth 8-bit (Grayscale, RGB, CMYK), 16-bit, 32-bit Floating Point (HDR)
Developed by Microsoft Corporation (later Joint Photographic Experts Group)
Released 2006
Magic Bytes
49 49 BC 01
Full JPEG-XR reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser FastBid JPEG-XR
Chrome Chrome
Firefox Firefox
Safari Safari
Edge Edge
IE IE (Legacy)
FastBid

FastBid Strengths

  • Historically allowed the FastBid application to securely associate and load proprietary construction plans within its ecosystem
Limitations
  • Completely obsolete and unsupported in modern software environments
  • The official IANA registration of the .fbs extension causes widespread false positives, breaking modern parsers, text editors, and AI SDKs attempting to read FlatBuffers schemas
JPEG-XR

JPEG-XR Strengths

  • Excellent support for 16-bit and 32-bit floating-point HDR images without massive file size bloat
  • Native support for alpha transparency, which standard JPEG fundamentally lacks
  • Computational complexity for decoding/encoding is relatively low, making it hardware-friendly
Limitations
  • Suffered a complete failure of adoption in the web browser market outside of Microsoft's ecosystem
  • Fully superseded by modern, open formats like WebP, AVIF, and JPEG XL which offer better compression and universal browser support
  • Multiple file extensions (.wdp, .hdp, .jxr) and MIME types cause confusion and parsing fragmentation

When to choose which format

FastBid
Use FastBid when…
  • Legacy Construction Blueprints
  • FastBid Estimating Software
  • Causing .fbs MIME Type Conflicts (FlatBuffers)
JPEG-XR
Use JPEG-XR when…
  • Legacy Windows Desktop Backgrounds
  • XPS (XML Paper Specification) Documents
  • Early High Dynamic Range (HDR) Photography
  • DirectX Textures
Share this comparison