Image MIME Reference
EMF
Windows Enhanced Metafile
image/x-emf
VS
JPEG Stereo Image
image/x-jps
JPS
A complete technical comparison of Windows Enhanced Metafile and JPEG Stereo Image — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
JPS wins on browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | EMF | JPS |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | Yes | ✕ No |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | ✕ No | Yes |
| HDR Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| EXIF Metadata | ✕ No | Yes |
| ICC Color Profile | Yes | Yes |
Windows Enhanced Metafile
image/x-emf
Extension
.emf
Container
Windows GDI/GDI+ Record Sequence
Compression
Uncompressed (Binary Drawing Records)
Algorithm
None
Color Depth
Vector (32-bit GDI/GDI+ Colors), Supports embedded 24-bit/32-bit bitmaps
Developed by
Microsoft Corporation
Released
1993
Magic Bytes
01 00 00 00 (Header Type) ... 20 45 4D 46 (Signature at offset 40)
JPEG Stereo Image
image/x-jps
Extension
.jps
Container
JPEG (JFIF/Exif)
Compression
Lossy (JPEG/DCT)
Algorithm
JPEG (Discrete Cosine Transform)
Color Depth
8-bit (Grayscale), 24-bit (RGB)
Developed by
Stereoscopic Community (Unofficial Standard)
Released
1990
Magic Bytes
FF D8 FF
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | EMF | JPS |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ |
✓ 1
|
Firefox
|
✕ |
✓ 1
|
Safari
|
✕ |
✓ 1
|
Edge
|
✕ |
✓ 12
|
IE (Legacy)
|
✓
|
✓
|
EMF
EMF Strengths
- Device independent, meaning it renders consistently across different monitors and printers regardless of resolution
- Fully supports 32-bit precision and advanced GDI+ drawing commands, including alpha transparency and anti-aliasing (EMF+)
- Native rendering within the Windows OS ensures fast performance and flawless fidelity in Microsoft Office applications
Limitations
- Heavily tied to the Windows Graphics Device Interface API, making it notoriously difficult to parse perfectly on macOS or Linux
- Completely unsupported by modern web standards; cannot be embedded in HTML without conversion to SVG
- Security history: Like WMF, malicious drawing records can theoretically exploit vulnerabilities in older GDI parsers
JPS
JPS Strengths
- 100% backward compatible with every standard 2D image viewer and web browser (which simply display the two halves side-by-side)
- Inherits JPEG's excellent lossy compression, resulting in small file sizes ideal for web transmission
- Extremely easy to generate programmatically by simply stitching two JPEG images side-by-side onto a wider canvas
Limitations
- Lack of a dedicated metadata standard means viewing software has to guess whether the layout is 'cross-eyed' (right eye left, left eye right) or 'parallel' (left eye left, right eye right), occasionally causing inverted depth
- Suffers from JPEG compression artifacts, which can break the stereoscopic illusion if compression noise differs between the left and right eyes
- Superseded in consumer electronics by the MPO (Multi-Picture Object) format, which stacks separate full-resolution JPEGs rather than squishing them side-by-side
When to choose which format
EMF
Use EMF when…
- Microsoft Office Vector Graphics and Clip Art
- Windows Print Spooling (EMF Spool Files)
- High-fidelity Vector Interchange on Windows
JPS
Use JPS when…
- Stereoscopic 3D Photography
- Virtual Reality (VR) Image Galleries
- Cross-eye / Parallel Stereograms