Image MIME Reference
DNG
Adobe Digital Negative
image/x-adobe-dng
VS
Microsoft Document Imaging
image/vnd.ms-modi
MODI
A complete technical comparison of Adobe Digital Negative and Microsoft Document Imaging — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | DNG | MODI |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | Yes | ✕ No |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| HDR Support | Yes | ✕ No |
| EXIF Metadata | Yes | ✕ No |
| ICC Color Profile | Yes | ✕ No |
Adobe Digital Negative
image/x-adobe-dng
Extension
.dng
Container
TIFF/EP
Compression
Lossless JPEG / Deflate / Lossy JPEG (DNG 1.4+)
Algorithm
Lossless JPEG (Standard)Lossy JPEG (Compression option)Uncompressed
Color Depth
12-bit, 14-bit, 16-bit, 32-bit (Floating Point HDR)
Developed by
Adobe Systems
Released
2004
Magic Bytes
49 49 2A 00 or 4D 4D 00 2A
Microsoft Document Imaging
image/vnd.ms-modi
Extension
.mdi
Container
TIFF Variant
Compression
LZW / Proprietary MS Compression
Algorithm
LZW (Modified)
Color Depth
1-bit (Monochrome), 8-bit (Grayscale), 24-bit (RGB)
Developed by
Microsoft Corporation
Released
2001
Magic Bytes
49 49 2A 00
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | DNG | MODI |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ | ✕ |
Firefox
|
✕ | ✕ |
Safari
|
✕ | ✕ |
Edge
|
✕ | ✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ | ✕ |
DNG
DNG Strengths
- Openly documented specification guarantees long-term archival accessibility, freeing photographers from proprietary manufacturer lock-in
- Lossless compression algorithms often result in files 15-20% smaller than uncompressed proprietary raw formats
- Natively supported by modern smartphone operating systems (iOS and Android) for high-end mobile photography
Limitations
- Conversion from proprietary raw to DNG takes processing time and can strip specific, proprietary manufacturer metadata (like active D-Lighting or in-camera lens corrections)
- File sizes are massive compared to standard JPEGs or HEIC files
- Cannot be rendered natively in web browsers without server-side processing or WebAssembly decoders
MODI
MODI Strengths
- Historically provided an excellent all-in-one scanned document format with built-in OCR and annotations before PDF editing became universally accessible
- Tightly integrated with Microsoft Office and SharePoint workflows in the early 2000s
Limitations
- Completely proprietary and obsolete; Microsoft abandoned it in favor of standard TIFF and PDF
- Causes widespread identification conflicts since its file signature is identical to a standard TIFF
- Extremely difficult to open on modern operating systems without relying on third-party conversion utilities
When to choose which format
DNG
Use DNG when…
- Digital Photography Archival
- Mobile Raw Capture (iOS ProRAW / Android Camera2 API)
- Cross-Platform Raw Editing Workflows
MODI
Use MODI when…
- Legacy Scanned Document Archival
- Microsoft Office XP/2003/2007 Workflows
- Embedded OCR Text Storage