Image MIME Reference
DNG
Adobe Digital Negative
image/x-adobe-dng
VS
Digital Camera Raw (Generic Linux MIME)
image/x-dcraw
Generic-RAW
A complete technical comparison of Adobe Digital Negative and Digital Camera Raw (Generic Linux MIME) — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | DNG | Generic-RAW |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | Yes | ✕ No |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| HDR Support | Yes | Yes |
| EXIF Metadata | Yes | Yes |
| ICC Color Profile | Yes | Yes |
Adobe Digital Negative
image/x-adobe-dng
Extension
.dng
Container
TIFF/EP
Compression
Lossless JPEG / Deflate / Lossy JPEG (DNG 1.4+)
Algorithm
Lossless JPEG (Standard)Lossy JPEG (Compression option)Uncompressed
Color Depth
12-bit, 14-bit, 16-bit, 32-bit (Floating Point HDR)
Developed by
Adobe Systems
Released
2004
Magic Bytes
49 49 2A 00 or 4D 4D 00 2A
Digital Camera Raw (Generic Linux MIME)
image/x-dcraw
Extension
.raw
Container
Varies (Predominantly TIFF/EP)
Compression
Lossless / Uncompressed
Algorithm
Varies (Often Lossless JPEG ITU-T81 or uncompressed)
Color Depth
12-bit, 14-bit, 16-bit
Developed by
freedesktop.org (MIME mapping) / Dave Coffin (dcraw tool)
Released
1997
Magic Bytes
Varies by vendor format
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | DNG | Generic-RAW |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ | ✕ |
Firefox
|
✕ | ✕ |
Safari
|
✕ | ✕ |
Edge
|
✕ | ✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ | ✕ |
DNG
DNG Strengths
- Openly documented specification guarantees long-term archival accessibility, freeing photographers from proprietary manufacturer lock-in
- Lossless compression algorithms often result in files 15-20% smaller than uncompressed proprietary raw formats
- Natively supported by modern smartphone operating systems (iOS and Android) for high-end mobile photography
Limitations
- Conversion from proprietary raw to DNG takes processing time and can strip specific, proprietary manufacturer metadata (like active D-Lighting or in-camera lens corrections)
- File sizes are massive compared to standard JPEGs or HEIC files
- Cannot be rendered natively in web browsers without server-side processing or WebAssembly decoders
Generic-RAW
Generic-RAW Strengths
- Provides a unified, highly useful catch-all MIME type for application developers who just need to know if a file is a raw image, rather than tracking 50+ individual camera extensions
- Deeply integrated into the Linux desktop ecosystem, ensuring file manager thumbnails work seamlessly via tools like ufraw-thumbnailer
Limitations
- Not an official IANA standard
- Can cause conflicts where standard TIFF files are misidentified as raw camera data by over-aggressive MIME sniffers
- The underlying 'dcraw' tool was abandoned by its creator in 2018 (though its successor, LibRaw, continues to maintain the ecosystem)
When to choose which format
DNG
Use DNG when…
- Digital Photography Archival
- Mobile Raw Capture (iOS ProRAW / Android Camera2 API)
- Cross-Platform Raw Editing Workflows
Generic-RAW
Use Generic-RAW when…
- Linux Desktop File Associations (GNOME/KDE)
- Thumbnail Generation for Raw Images (UFRaw/LibRaw)
- Server-side Image Processing Fallbacks