Image MIME Reference
DICOM-RLE
DICOM Run-Length Encoding
image/dicom-rle
VS
JPEG 2000 Compound Image File Format
image/jpm
JPM
A complete technical comparison of DICOM Run-Length Encoding and JPEG 2000 Compound Image File Format — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | DICOM-RLE | JPM |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | ✕ No | Yes |
| Animation Support | Yes | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | ✕ No | Yes |
| HDR Support | Yes | ✕ No |
| EXIF Metadata | ✕ No | Yes |
| ICC Color Profile | Yes | Yes |
DICOM Run-Length Encoding
image/dicom-rle
Extension
.dcm.dicom
Container
DICOM (PS3.10)
Compression
Lossless (RLE)
Algorithm
Run-Length Encoding (RLE)
Color Depth
8-bit, 16-bit, 24-bit
Developed by
National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) / ACR
Released
1993
Magic Bytes
44 49 43 4D (at byte offset 128)
JPEG 2000 Compound Image File Format
image/jpm
Extension
.jpm.jpgm
Container
ISOBMFF / JPM (ISO/IEC 15444-6)
Compression
Lossy / Lossless / Mixed Raster Content (MRC)
Algorithm
JPEG 2000JBIG2JPEGMMR
Color Depth
1-bit (Text/Masks), 8-bit, 16-bit, 24-bit
Developed by
Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG)
Released
2003
Magic Bytes
00 00 00 0C 6A 50 20 20 0D 0A 87 0A ... 66 74 79 70 6A 70 6D 20
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | DICOM-RLE | JPM |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ | ✕ |
Firefox
|
✕ | ✕ |
Safari
|
✕ | ✕ |
Edge
|
✕ | ✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ | ✕ |
DICOM-RLE
DICOM-RLE Strengths
- Guarantees lossless preservation of critical medical data necessary for diagnostics
- Extremely robust metadata structure containing patient information, modality, and spatial geometry
- Faster to encode and decode than complex compression schemes like JPEG 2000
Limitations
- RLE compression offers very low compression ratios compared to modern codecs like JPEG-LS or JPEG 2000
- Zero support in web browsers or standard consumer image viewers
- Strict data privacy regulations (HIPAA/GDPR) make handling DICOM files complex due to embedded PHI
JPM
JPM Strengths
- Highly optimized for scanned documents, drastically reducing file sizes without sacrificing the readability of text or the quality of embedded photos
- Supports multi-page documents within a single file
- Object-based architecture allows for complex layout representation and independent extraction of elements
Limitations
- Failed to achieve widespread adoption, largely being overshadowed by PDF/A and DjVu
- Zero native web browser compatibility
- Requires complex, specialized software to properly encode and decode the multi-layered MRC structure
When to choose which format
DICOM-RLE
Use DICOM-RLE when…
- Medical Imaging
- Ultrasound
- X-Rays / CT / MRI
- PACS Archives
JPM
Use JPM when…
- Scanned Document Archiving
- Mixed Raster Content (MRC) Imaging
- Digital Libraries