Image MIME Reference
DICOM-RLE
DICOM Run-Length Encoding
image/dicom-rle
VS
JPEG XR (HD Photo)
image/vnd.ms-photo
JPEG-XR
A complete technical comparison of DICOM Run-Length Encoding and JPEG XR (HD Photo) — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | DICOM-RLE | JPEG-XR |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | ✕ No | Yes |
| Animation Support | Yes | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | ✕ No | Yes |
| HDR Support | Yes | Yes |
| EXIF Metadata | ✕ No | Yes |
| ICC Color Profile | Yes | Yes |
DICOM Run-Length Encoding
image/dicom-rle
Extension
.dcm.dicom
Container
DICOM (PS3.10)
Compression
Lossless (RLE)
Algorithm
Run-Length Encoding (RLE)
Color Depth
8-bit, 16-bit, 24-bit
Developed by
National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) / ACR
Released
1993
Magic Bytes
44 49 43 4D (at byte offset 128)
JPEG XR (HD Photo)
image/vnd.ms-photo
Extension
.jxr.wdp.hdp
Container
TIFF-like Image File Directory (IFD)
Compression
Lossy (Lapped Bi-orthogonal Transform) / Lossless
Algorithm
Lapped Bi-orthogonal Transform (LBT)
Color Depth
8-bit (Grayscale, RGB, CMYK), 16-bit, 32-bit Floating Point (HDR)
Developed by
Microsoft Corporation (later Joint Photographic Experts Group)
Released
2006
Magic Bytes
49 49 BC 01
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | DICOM-RLE | JPEG-XR |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ | ✕ |
Firefox
|
✕ | ✕ |
Safari
|
✕ | ✕ |
Edge
|
✕ | ✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ |
✓
|
DICOM-RLE
DICOM-RLE Strengths
- Guarantees lossless preservation of critical medical data necessary for diagnostics
- Extremely robust metadata structure containing patient information, modality, and spatial geometry
- Faster to encode and decode than complex compression schemes like JPEG 2000
Limitations
- RLE compression offers very low compression ratios compared to modern codecs like JPEG-LS or JPEG 2000
- Zero support in web browsers or standard consumer image viewers
- Strict data privacy regulations (HIPAA/GDPR) make handling DICOM files complex due to embedded PHI
JPEG-XR
JPEG-XR Strengths
- Excellent support for 16-bit and 32-bit floating-point HDR images without massive file size bloat
- Native support for alpha transparency, which standard JPEG fundamentally lacks
- Computational complexity for decoding/encoding is relatively low, making it hardware-friendly
Limitations
- Suffered a complete failure of adoption in the web browser market outside of Microsoft's ecosystem
- Fully superseded by modern, open formats like WebP, AVIF, and JPEG XL which offer better compression and universal browser support
- Multiple file extensions (.wdp, .hdp, .jxr) and MIME types cause confusion and parsing fragmentation
When to choose which format
DICOM-RLE
Use DICOM-RLE when…
- Medical Imaging
- Ultrasound
- X-Rays / CT / MRI
- PACS Archives
JPEG-XR
Use JPEG-XR when…
- Legacy Windows Desktop Backgrounds
- XPS (XML Paper Specification) Documents
- Early High Dynamic Range (HDR) Photography
- DirectX Textures