Free webp to jpg
Image MIME Reference
DGN

MicroStation Design File

image/x-vnd.dgn
VS

JPEG Stereo Image

image/x-jps
JPS

A complete technical comparison of MicroStation Design File and JPEG Stereo Image — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

JPS wins on browser support

Feature Support

Feature DGN JPS
Transparency (Alpha) Yes ✕ No
Animation Support ✕ No ✕ No
Progressive Loading ✕ No Yes
HDR Support ✕ No ✕ No
EXIF Metadata ✕ No Yes
ICC Color Profile ✕ No Yes
MicroStation Design File
image/x-vnd.dgn
Extension
.dgn
Container Microsoft OLE Compound File (V8) / IGDS (V7)
Compression Uncompressed / OLE Structured Storage
Algorithm
None
Color Depth Indexed Color (V7), 24-bit True Color (V8)
Developed by Intergraph (Originally) / Bentley Systems (Currently)
Released 1980
Magic Bytes
D0 CF 11 E0 A1 B1 1A E1 (For V8 DGN)
Full DGN reference →
JPEG Stereo Image
image/x-jps
Extension
.jps
Container JPEG (JFIF/Exif)
Compression Lossy (JPEG/DCT)
Algorithm
JPEG (Discrete Cosine Transform)
Color Depth 8-bit (Grayscale), 24-bit (RGB)
Developed by Stereoscopic Community (Unofficial Standard)
Released 1990
Magic Bytes
FF D8 FF
Full JPS reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser DGN JPS
Chrome Chrome
✓ 1
Firefox Firefox
✓ 1
Safari Safari
✓ 1
Edge Edge
✓ 12
IE IE (Legacy)
DGN

DGN Strengths

  • Exceptionally robust at handling massive, coordinate-heavy infrastructure models that would frequently crash older versions of competing CAD software
  • Deeply entrenched as the absolute standard format for many global departments of transportation and civil engineering firms
  • V8 architecture supports boundless design plane coordinates, eliminating the physical scaling limitations of V7
Limitations
  • Deeply proprietary format requiring complex third-party libraries (like the ODA SDK) to parse or write programmatically outside of the Bentley ecosystem
  • V8's reliance on the archaic Microsoft OLE Compound File container makes file introspection cumbersome
  • Cannot be rendered natively in web browsers without converting to WebGL/Canvas formats or SVG
JPS

JPS Strengths

  • 100% backward compatible with every standard 2D image viewer and web browser (which simply display the two halves side-by-side)
  • Inherits JPEG's excellent lossy compression, resulting in small file sizes ideal for web transmission
  • Extremely easy to generate programmatically by simply stitching two JPEG images side-by-side onto a wider canvas
Limitations
  • Lack of a dedicated metadata standard means viewing software has to guess whether the layout is 'cross-eyed' (right eye left, left eye right) or 'parallel' (left eye left, right eye right), occasionally causing inverted depth
  • Suffers from JPEG compression artifacts, which can break the stereoscopic illusion if compression noise differs between the left and right eyes
  • Superseded in consumer electronics by the MPO (Multi-Picture Object) format, which stacks separate full-resolution JPEGs rather than squishing them side-by-side

When to choose which format

DGN
Use DGN when…
  • Civil Engineering and Plant Design
  • Large-scale Architecture and Construction (AEC)
  • 2D/3D Infrastructure Modeling
JPS
Use JPS when…
  • Stereoscopic 3D Photography
  • Virtual Reality (VR) Image Galleries
  • Cross-eye / Parallel Stereograms
Share this comparison