Free webp to jpg
EN
Image MIME Reference
DECE-Graphic

Digital Entertainment Content Ecosystem (DECE) Graphic

image/vnd.dece.graphic
VS

North American Presentation Level Protocol Syntax

image/naplps
NAPLPS

A complete technical comparison of Digital Entertainment Content Ecosystem (DECE) Graphic and North American Presentation Level Protocol Syntax — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature DECE-Graphic NAPLPS
Transparency (Alpha) Yes ✕ No
Animation Support ✕ No Yes
Progressive Loading ✕ No Yes
HDR Support ✕ No ✕ No
EXIF Metadata ✕ No ✕ No
ICC Color Profile ✕ No ✕ No
Digital Entertainment Content Ecosystem (DECE) Graphic
image/vnd.dece.graphic
Extension
.jpg.png.uvi
Container Standard JPEG/PNG within DECE CFF structures
Compression Lossy (JPEG) / Lossless (PNG)
Algorithm
DCT (JPEG)DEFLATE (PNG)
Color Depth 8-bit (RGB), 24-bit (RGB)
Developed by Digital Entertainment Content Ecosystem (DECE) LLC
Released 2011
Magic Bytes
FF D8 FF (If JPEG) / 89 50 4E 47 (If PNG)
Full DECE-Graphic reference →
North American Presentation Level Protocol Syntax
image/naplps
Extension
.nap.naplps
Container NAPLPS Byte Stream
Compression Uncompressed (Tokenized ASCII Commands)
Algorithm
None (Coordinate encoding)
Color Depth 16-color palette (Indexed from larger color spaces)
Developed by ANSI / CSA (Based on Canadian CRC's Telidon)
Released 1983
Magic Bytes
1B (Variable / ESC sequences)
Full NAPLPS reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser DECE-Graphic NAPLPS
Chrome Chrome
✕ ✕
Firefox Firefox
✕ ✕
Safari Safari
✕ ✕
Edge Edge
✕ ✕
IE IE (Legacy)
✕ ✕
DECE-Graphic

DECE-Graphic Strengths

  • Allowed the UltraViolet DRM ecosystem to easily distinguish structural UI/cover graphic assets from actual encrypted video tracks in a Common File Format container
Limitations
  • Completely obsolete since the 2019 shutdown of UltraViolet
  • Unnecessary abstraction, as the underlying files were just standard JPEGs or PNGs
  • Causes modern strict MIME-type validators to fail if they rely on the Content-Type header
NAPLPS

NAPLPS Strengths

  • Extremely bandwidth-efficient, enabling colorful graphical interfaces over early 300 baud dial-up connections
  • Resolution-independent vector scaling allowed the exact same file to be displayed accurately on varied early PC monitors and television sets
Limitations
  • Completely obsolete and unsupported by modern web technologies
  • Relies heavily on stateful parsing and terminal emulators rather than straightforward file decoding
  • Easily misidentified by MIME sniffers as plain text or generic binary streams due to the lack of a standardized file header

When to choose which format

DECE-Graphic
Use DECE-Graphic when…
  • UltraViolet Movie Cover Art
  • Common File Format (CFF) Asset Manifests
  • Legacy DRM Ecosystems
NAPLPS
Use NAPLPS when…
  • 1980s Videotex Services
  • Prodigy Online Service Graphics
  • Historical BBS Terminal Graphics
  • Legacy Teletext Broadcasts

More comparisons

DECE-Graphic vs ACES → NAPLPS vs ACES → DECE-Graphic vs APNG → NAPLPS vs APNG → DECE-Graphic vs AVCI → NAPLPS vs AVCI → DECE-Graphic vs AVCS → NAPLPS vs AVCS → DECE-Graphic vs AVIF → NAPLPS vs AVIF → All comparisons →
Share this comparison