Free webp to jpg
Image MIME Reference
CNS-INF2

Comverse Network Systems INF2 Image

image/vnd.cns.inf2
VS

JPEG XR (HD Photo)

image/vnd.ms-photo
JPEG-XR

A complete technical comparison of Comverse Network Systems INF2 Image and JPEG XR (HD Photo) — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature CNS-INF2 JPEG-XR
Transparency (Alpha) ✕ No Yes
Animation Support ✕ No ✕ No
Progressive Loading ✕ No Yes
HDR Support ✕ No Yes
EXIF Metadata ✕ No Yes
ICC Color Profile ✕ No Yes
Comverse Network Systems INF2 Image
image/vnd.cns.inf2
Extension
.inf2
Container Proprietary Comverse Container
Compression Proprietary
Algorithm
Unknown (Proprietary Telecom Encoding)
Color Depth Unknown
Developed by Comverse Network Systems (Ann McLaughlin)
Released 1999
Magic Bytes
Unknown (Proprietary)
Full CNS-INF2 reference →
JPEG XR (HD Photo)
image/vnd.ms-photo
Extension
.jxr.wdp.hdp
Container TIFF-like Image File Directory (IFD)
Compression Lossy (Lapped Bi-orthogonal Transform) / Lossless
Algorithm
Lapped Bi-orthogonal Transform (LBT)
Color Depth 8-bit (Grayscale, RGB, CMYK), 16-bit, 32-bit Floating Point (HDR)
Developed by Microsoft Corporation (later Joint Photographic Experts Group)
Released 2006
Magic Bytes
49 49 BC 01
Full JPEG-XR reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser CNS-INF2 JPEG-XR
Chrome Chrome
Firefox Firefox
Safari Safari
Edge Edge
IE IE (Legacy)
CNS-INF2

CNS-INF2 Strengths

  • Historically allowed Comverse to standardize media transmission internally across their global telecom messaging platforms
Limitations
  • Completely obsolete and non-functional outside of decommissioned telecom infrastructure
  • Undocumented, closed-source binary structure
  • Zero support in modern image processing libraries like ImageMagick, libvips, or FFmpeg
JPEG-XR

JPEG-XR Strengths

  • Excellent support for 16-bit and 32-bit floating-point HDR images without massive file size bloat
  • Native support for alpha transparency, which standard JPEG fundamentally lacks
  • Computational complexity for decoding/encoding is relatively low, making it hardware-friendly
Limitations
  • Suffered a complete failure of adoption in the web browser market outside of Microsoft's ecosystem
  • Fully superseded by modern, open formats like WebP, AVIF, and JPEG XL which offer better compression and universal browser support
  • Multiple file extensions (.wdp, .hdp, .jxr) and MIME types cause confusion and parsing fragmentation

When to choose which format

CNS-INF2
Use CNS-INF2 when…
  • Legacy Telecom Infrastructure
  • Historical Comverse Unified Messaging Systems
  • Proprietary Server-to-Server Media Exchange
JPEG-XR
Use JPEG-XR when…
  • Legacy Windows Desktop Backgrounds
  • XPS (XML Paper Specification) Documents
  • Early High Dynamic Range (HDR) Photography
  • DirectX Textures
Share this comparison