Image MIME Reference
CMU-Raster
CMU Window Manager Raster
image/x-cmu-raster
VS
Extended Image File Format
image/vnd.xiff
XIFF
A complete technical comparison of CMU Window Manager Raster and Extended Image File Format — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | CMU-Raster | XIFF |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| HDR Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| EXIF Metadata | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| ICC Color Profile | ✕ No | ✕ No |
CMU Window Manager Raster
image/x-cmu-raster
Extension
.ras
Container
CMU Window Manager Bitmap
Compression
Uncompressed
Algorithm
None
Color Depth
1-bit (Monochrome), 8-bit (Indexed/Grayscale)
Developed by
Carnegie Mellon University (CMU)
Released
1980s
Magic Bytes
F1 00 40 BB
Extended Image File Format
image/vnd.xiff
Extension
.xif
Container
TIFF-based Proprietary Container
Compression
CCITT Group 3 / Group 4 / LZW / Uncompressed
Algorithm
CCITT Group 4LZWNone
Color Depth
1-bit (Monochrome), 8-bit (Grayscale), 24-bit (RGB)
Developed by
Keyfile Corporation
Released
1994
Magic Bytes
49 49 2A 00 or 4D 4D 00 2A
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | CMU-Raster | XIFF |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ | ✕ |
Firefox
|
✕ | ✕ |
Safari
|
✕ | ✕ |
Edge
|
✕ | ✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ | ✕ |
CMU-Raster
CMU-Raster Strengths
- Incredibly simple, uncompressed binary structure that was easy for early, memory-constrained UNIX workstations to parse and render
Limitations
- Completely obsolete and unsupported outside of niche historical command-line tools like Netpbm
- The shared '.ras' file extension causes frequent file misidentification and system conflicts
- Lacks all modern imaging features, including metadata, compression, and alpha channel transparency
XIFF
XIFF Strengths
- Pioneered early enterprise document workflow integration by binding administrative routing data directly to the document image file
- Leveraged efficient fax compression standards to keep storage requirements low on 1990s server infrastructure
Limitations
- Completely proprietary and obsolete; Keyfile Corporation's software ecosystem no longer exists
- Causes widespread MIME type identification conflicts due to sharing the exact same binary header signature as standard TIFF files
- Zero support in modern operating systems or web browsers
When to choose which format
CMU-Raster
Use CMU-Raster when…
- Historical UNIX / Andrew Project Archival
- Legacy Academic Computing Research
XIFF
Use XIFF when…
- Keyfile Enterprise Document Management
- Legacy Corporate Workflow Archival
- Scanned Multi-page Document Routing