Image MIME Reference
CMU-Raster
CMU Window Manager Raster
image/x-cmu-raster
VS
Sony SR2 Raw Image
image/x-sony-sr2
Sony-SR2
A complete technical comparison of CMU Window Manager Raster and Sony SR2 Raw Image — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | CMU-Raster | Sony-SR2 |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| HDR Support | ✕ No | Yes |
| EXIF Metadata | ✕ No | Yes |
| ICC Color Profile | ✕ No | Yes |
CMU Window Manager Raster
image/x-cmu-raster
Extension
.ras
Container
CMU Window Manager Bitmap
Compression
Uncompressed
Algorithm
None
Color Depth
1-bit (Monochrome), 8-bit (Indexed/Grayscale)
Developed by
Carnegie Mellon University (CMU)
Released
1980s
Magic Bytes
F1 00 40 BB
Sony SR2 Raw Image
image/x-sony-sr2
Extension
.sr2
Container
TIFF-based (Proprietary)
Compression
Uncompressed / Sony Proprietary Lossless
Algorithm
NoneSony Proprietary Lossless
Color Depth
12-bit (Per Channel)
Developed by
Sony Corporation
Released
2005
Magic Bytes
49 49 2A 00
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | CMU-Raster | Sony-SR2 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
CMU-Raster
CMU-Raster Strengths
- Incredibly simple, uncompressed binary structure that was easy for early, memory-constrained UNIX workstations to parse and render
Limitations
- Completely obsolete and unsupported outside of niche historical command-line tools like Netpbm
- The shared '.ras' file extension causes frequent file misidentification and system conflicts
- Lacks all modern imaging features, including metadata, compression, and alpha channel transparency
Sony-SR2
Sony-SR2 Strengths
- Retains raw, unprocessed sensor data from legacy cameras, allowing modern raw processors to extract vastly superior image quality than what was possible in 2005
- Utilizes a standard TIFF container structure, ensuring that community-maintained open-source decoding libraries (like LibRaw) can easily parse and maintain support for it indefinitely
Limitations
- Completely obsolete format that has not been utilized in a new camera release in over a decade
- MIME detection via magic bytes is unreliable due to TIFF header spoofing, requiring deeper EXIF inspection
- Cannot be natively viewed in web browsers or standard operating system image viewers without specialized decoders
When to choose which format
CMU-Raster
Use CMU-Raster when…
- Historical UNIX / Andrew Project Archival
- Legacy Academic Computing Research
Sony-SR2
Use Sony-SR2 when…
- Legacy Sony Cyber-shot/Alpha Photography
- Non-destructive Image Post-Processing
- Raw Imaging Archival