Free webp to jpg
EN
Image MIME Reference
CMU-Raster

CMU Window Manager Raster

image/x-cmu-raster
VS

SealedMedia SoftSeal GIF

image/vnd.sealedmedia.softseal.gif
SoftSeal-GIF

A complete technical comparison of CMU Window Manager Raster and SealedMedia SoftSeal GIF — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature CMU-Raster SoftSeal-GIF
Transparency (Alpha) ✕ No ✕ No
Animation Support ✕ No ✕ No
Progressive Loading ✕ No ✕ No
HDR Support ✕ No ✕ No
EXIF Metadata ✕ No ✕ No
ICC Color Profile ✕ No ✕ No
CMU Window Manager Raster
image/x-cmu-raster
Extension
.ras
Container CMU Window Manager Bitmap
Compression Uncompressed
Algorithm
None
Color Depth 1-bit (Monochrome), 8-bit (Indexed/Grayscale)
Developed by Carnegie Mellon University (CMU)
Released 1980s
Magic Bytes
F1 00 40 BB
Full CMU-Raster reference →
SealedMedia SoftSeal GIF
image/vnd.sealedmedia.softseal.gif
Extension
.sgif.sealed-gif
Container SealedMedia SoftSeal Wrapper
Compression Encrypted Payload (LZW)
Algorithm
AES EncryptionLZW (Internal GIF payload)
Color Depth Encrypted Payload (Historically up to 8-bit Indexed)
Developed by SealedMedia (Acquired by Oracle Corporation)
Released Late 1990s
Magic Bytes
Unknown (Proprietary SealedMedia Container)
Full SoftSeal-GIF reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser CMU-Raster SoftSeal-GIF
Chrome Chrome
✕ ✕
Firefox Firefox
✕ ✕
Safari Safari
✕ ✕
Edge Edge
✕ ✕
IE IE (Legacy)
✕ ✕
CMU-Raster

CMU-Raster Strengths

  • Incredibly simple, uncompressed binary structure that was easy for early, memory-constrained UNIX workstations to parse and render
Limitations
  • Completely obsolete and unsupported outside of niche historical command-line tools like Netpbm
  • The shared '.ras' file extension causes frequent file misidentification and system conflicts
  • Lacks all modern imaging features, including metadata, compression, and alpha channel transparency
SoftSeal-GIF

SoftSeal-GIF Strengths

  • Provided robust, persistent security that traveled with the file, ensuring images could not be leaked even if sent outside the corporate firewall
  • Enabled dynamic revocation, meaning administrators could instantly kill access to a file globally
Limitations
  • Completely proprietary and dependent on an active authentication server; if the DRM server dies, the image is permanently locked
  • Zero support in modern operating systems, web browsers, or standard image editing suites without heavy enterprise client installations
  • Often caused massive friction for legitimate end-users trying to view documents

When to choose which format

CMU-Raster
Use CMU-Raster when…
  • Historical UNIX / Andrew Project Archival
  • Legacy Academic Computing Research
SoftSeal-GIF
Use SoftSeal-GIF when…
  • Enterprise Information Rights Management (IRM)
  • Secure Distribution of Corporate Assets
  • Revocable Medical, Legal, or Financial Imaging

More comparisons

CMU-Raster vs ACES → SoftSeal-GIF vs ACES → CMU-Raster vs APNG → SoftSeal-GIF vs APNG → CMU-Raster vs AVCI → SoftSeal-GIF vs AVCI → CMU-Raster vs AVCS → SoftSeal-GIF vs AVCS → CMU-Raster vs AVIF → SoftSeal-GIF vs AVIF → All comparisons →
Share this comparison