Image MIME Reference
CMU-Raster
CMU Window Manager Raster
image/x-cmu-raster
VS
Network FlashPix
image/vnd.net-fpx
Net-FPX
A complete technical comparison of CMU Window Manager Raster and Network FlashPix — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | CMU-Raster | Net-FPX |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | ✕ No | Yes |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | ✕ No | Yes |
| HDR Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| EXIF Metadata | ✕ No | Yes |
| ICC Color Profile | ✕ No | Yes |
CMU Window Manager Raster
image/x-cmu-raster
Extension
.ras
Container
CMU Window Manager Bitmap
Compression
Uncompressed
Algorithm
None
Color Depth
1-bit (Monochrome), 8-bit (Indexed/Grayscale)
Developed by
Carnegie Mellon University (CMU)
Released
1980s
Magic Bytes
F1 00 40 BB
Network FlashPix
image/vnd.net-fpx
Extension
.fpx
Container
Microsoft OLE Structured Storage (COM)
Compression
JPEG (Lossy) / Uncompressed / Single-color (Solid)
Algorithm
JPEGNone
Color Depth
8-bit (Grayscale/Indexed), 24-bit (RGB), 32-bit (CMYK/RGBA)
Developed by
Digital Imaging Group (Kodak, HP, Live Picture, Microsoft)
Released
1996
Magic Bytes
D0 CF 11 E0 A1 B1 1A E1
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | CMU-Raster | Net-FPX |
|---|---|---|
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
CMU-Raster
CMU-Raster Strengths
- Incredibly simple, uncompressed binary structure that was easy for early, memory-constrained UNIX workstations to parse and render
Limitations
- Completely obsolete and unsupported outside of niche historical command-line tools like Netpbm
- The shared '.ras' file extension causes frequent file misidentification and system conflicts
- Lacks all modern imaging features, including metadata, compression, and alpha channel transparency
Net-FPX
Net-FPX Strengths
- Revolutionized web imaging in the late 1990s by proving that massive gigapixel images could be navigated seamlessly over 56k dial-up modems
- Pioneered the tile-based, multi-resolution pyramid concepts that eventually evolved into modern standards like IIIF (International Image Interoperability Framework)
Limitations
- Completely obsolete, having been replaced by standard JPEG servers and modern tiling formats like Deep Zoom or JPEG 2000/XR
- Relied on proprietary Java applets or ActiveX controls to render the tiles dynamically in a web browser
- Extremely complex to parse server-side due to the heavy OLE filesystem container
When to choose which format
CMU-Raster
Use CMU-Raster when…
- Historical UNIX / Andrew Project Archival
- Legacy Academic Computing Research
Net-FPX
Use Net-FPX when…
- Historical Internet Imaging Protocol (IIP) Streaming
- Early E-Commerce Deep Zoom Implementations
- Legacy High-Resolution Image Servers