Image MIME Reference
CMU-Raster
CMU Window Manager Raster
image/x-cmu-raster
VS
JPEG XS Image (HEIF Container)
image/jxsi
JPEG-XS-(HEIF)
A complete technical comparison of CMU Window Manager Raster and JPEG XS Image (HEIF Container) — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | CMU-Raster | JPEG-XS-(HEIF) |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | ✕ No | Yes |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| HDR Support | ✕ No | Yes |
| EXIF Metadata | ✕ No | Yes |
| ICC Color Profile | ✕ No | Yes |
CMU Window Manager Raster
image/x-cmu-raster
Extension
.ras
Container
CMU Window Manager Bitmap
Compression
Uncompressed
Algorithm
None
Color Depth
1-bit (Monochrome), 8-bit (Indexed/Grayscale)
Developed by
Carnegie Mellon University (CMU)
Released
1980s
Magic Bytes
F1 00 40 BB
JPEG XS Image (HEIF Container)
image/jxsi
Extension
.jxsi.jxs.hif
Container
HEIF / ISOBMFF (ISO/IEC 23008-12)
Compression
Lossy (Visually Lossless) / Mathematically Lossless
Algorithm
JPEG XS (ISO/IEC 21122-1)
Color Depth
8-bit, 10-bit, 12-bit, 14-bit, 16-bit
Developed by
Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG)
Released
2019
Magic Bytes
XX XX XX XX 66 74 79 70 6A 78 73 69
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | CMU-Raster | JPEG-XS-(HEIF) |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ | ✕ |
Firefox
|
✕ | ✕ |
Safari
|
✕ | ✕ |
Edge
|
✕ | ✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ | ✕ |
CMU-Raster
CMU-Raster Strengths
- Incredibly simple, uncompressed binary structure that was easy for early, memory-constrained UNIX workstations to parse and render
Limitations
- Completely obsolete and unsupported outside of niche historical command-line tools like Netpbm
- The shared '.ras' file extension causes frequent file misidentification and system conflicts
- Lacks all modern imaging features, including metadata, compression, and alpha channel transparency
JPEG-XS-(HEIF)
JPEG-XS-(HEIF) Strengths
- Provides sub-millisecond encoding and decoding latency while retaining visually lossless quality
- Brings the extensive metadata, EXIF, XMP, and color-profiling capabilities of the HEIF container to JPEG XS
- Allows grouping of multiple high-quality JPEG XS frames into a single collection file
Limitations
- Zero web browser compatibility, limiting it entirely to professional and industrial hardware workflows
- Extremely niche adoption compared to standard HEVC-based HEIC or raw JPEG XS codestreams
- Requires custom parsing logic to extract the JPEG XS codestream from the HEIF boxes
When to choose which format
CMU-Raster
Use CMU-Raster when…
- Historical UNIX / Andrew Project Archival
- Legacy Academic Computing Research
JPEG-XS-(HEIF)
Use JPEG-XS-(HEIF) when…
- Live Broadcast Infrastructure
- Medical Imaging & Archival
- Video over IP Networks
- Automotive & Drone Systems