Image MIME Reference
CMU-Raster
CMU Window Manager Raster
image/x-cmu-raster
VS
Windows Icon (Legacy MIME)
image/x-icon
ICO
A complete technical comparison of CMU Window Manager Raster and Windows Icon (Legacy MIME) — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
ICO wins on browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | CMU-Raster | ICO |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | ✕ No | Yes |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| HDR Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| EXIF Metadata | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| ICC Color Profile | ✕ No | ✕ No |
CMU Window Manager Raster
image/x-cmu-raster
Extension
.ras
Container
CMU Window Manager Bitmap
Compression
Uncompressed
Algorithm
None
Color Depth
1-bit (Monochrome), 8-bit (Indexed/Grayscale)
Developed by
Carnegie Mellon University (CMU)
Released
1980s
Magic Bytes
F1 00 40 BB
Windows Icon (Legacy MIME)
image/x-icon
Extension
.ico
Container
ICO Directory Structure
Compression
Uncompressed (DIB/BMP) / Deflate (Embedded PNG)
Algorithm
NoneDeflate (via PNG)
Color Depth
1-bit, 4-bit, 8-bit, 24-bit (True Color), 32-bit (RGBA)
Developed by
Microsoft Corporation
Released
1985
Magic Bytes
00 00 01 00
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | CMU-Raster | ICO |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ |
✓ 1
|
Firefox
|
✕ |
✓ 1
|
Safari
|
✕ |
✓ 1
|
Edge
|
✕ |
✓ 12
|
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ |
✓
|
CMU-Raster
CMU-Raster Strengths
- Incredibly simple, uncompressed binary structure that was easy for early, memory-constrained UNIX workstations to parse and render
Limitations
- Completely obsolete and unsupported outside of niche historical command-line tools like Netpbm
- The shared '.ras' file extension causes frequent file misidentification and system conflicts
- Lacks all modern imaging features, including metadata, compression, and alpha channel transparency
ICO
ICO Strengths
- Universally supported by every web browser in existence for website favicons
- Packs multiple resolutions into a single file, eliminating the need to serve different files for the taskbar vs. the desktop
- Modern support for embedded PNGs (since Windows Vista) allows for excellent 32-bit transparency (alpha channels) and drastically reduced file sizes
Limitations
- Internal file structure is convoluted due to decades of legacy cruft, such as the requirement for BMP data to lack a standard file header but double the height property for an archaic XOR/AND mask
- Larger file size compared to a single optimized PNG or SVG, as it literally stores the same image multiple times at different scales
- The MIME type landscape is highly fragmented (x-icon vs. vnd.microsoft.icon), causing occasional caching or strict-MIME validation errors on restrictive servers
When to choose which format
CMU-Raster
Use CMU-Raster when…
- Historical UNIX / Andrew Project Archival
- Legacy Academic Computing Research
ICO
Use ICO when…
- Website Favicons (favicon.ico)
- Windows Application Executable Icons (.exe)
- Desktop Shortcut Icons