Free webp to jpg
Image MIME Reference
CMU-Raster

CMU Window Manager Raster

image/x-cmu-raster
VS

High Efficiency Image File Format

image/heif
HEIF

A complete technical comparison of CMU Window Manager Raster and High Efficiency Image File Format — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature CMU-Raster HEIF
Transparency (Alpha) ✕ No Yes
Animation Support ✕ No Yes
Progressive Loading ✕ No ✕ No
HDR Support ✕ No Yes
EXIF Metadata ✕ No Yes
ICC Color Profile ✕ No Yes
CMU Window Manager Raster
image/x-cmu-raster
Extension
.ras
Container CMU Window Manager Bitmap
Compression Uncompressed
Algorithm
None
Color Depth 1-bit (Monochrome), 8-bit (Indexed/Grayscale)
Developed by Carnegie Mellon University (CMU)
Released 1980s
Magic Bytes
F1 00 40 BB
Full CMU-Raster reference →
High Efficiency Image File Format
image/heif
Extension
.heif.hif
Container HEIF / ISOBMFF (ISO/IEC 14496-12)
Compression Lossy / Lossless
Algorithm
Codec Agnostic (HEVC, AVC, JPEG, AV1)
Color Depth 8-bit, 10-bit, 12-bit, 16-bit
Developed by Moving Picture Experts Group (MPEG)
Released 2015
Magic Bytes
XX XX XX XX 66 74 79 70 6D 69 66 31
Full HEIF reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser CMU-Raster HEIF
Chrome Chrome
Firefox Firefox
Safari Safari
Edge Edge
IE IE (Legacy)
CMU-Raster

CMU-Raster Strengths

  • Incredibly simple, uncompressed binary structure that was easy for early, memory-constrained UNIX workstations to parse and render
Limitations
  • Completely obsolete and unsupported outside of niche historical command-line tools like Netpbm
  • The shared '.ras' file extension causes frequent file misidentification and system conflicts
  • Lacks all modern imaging features, including metadata, compression, and alpha channel transparency
HEIF

HEIF Strengths

  • Highly flexible container that can store image bursts, animations, focal stacks, and stereo 3D images in one file
  • Natively supports depth maps and alpha channels, making it perfect for computational photography
  • When paired with modern codecs like HEVC or AV1, it provides massive storage savings over legacy formats like JPEG
Limitations
  • Codec agnosticism makes broad software decoding difficult, as the container might hold proprietary or unsupported codecs
  • Zero cross-platform web browser support, requiring conversion for online publishing
  • Often confused with the more specific 'image/heic' and 'image/avif' MIME types

When to choose which format

CMU-Raster
Use CMU-Raster when…
  • Historical UNIX / Andrew Project Archival
  • Legacy Academic Computing Research
HEIF
Use HEIF when…
  • Digital Photography
  • Camera Capture
  • Image Archiving
  • Multi-image composites
Share this comparison